Crucial Numbers on Bias May Not Be Obvious Ones
Cummins, Claudia, American Banker
WASHINGTON - When regulators release their report on the millions of mortgage applications processed last year, the public is likely to focus almost exclusively on one figure: the disparity in denial rates for blacks and for whites.
But experts say this statistic's value in explaining trends in minority lending is significantly overstated. Focusing exclusively on that number masks much of the real value of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data, they say.
Instead, anyone wanting to truly understand whether the banking industry's emphasis on minority lending is making a difference should look at several other variables, including application flows and market share analyses.
"The rejection rate information has got to be looked at very carefully," said Allen Fishbein, general counsel for the Washington-based Center for Community Change. "Questions like the volume of applications are equally as important."
"Denial. rates, market share, and applications - those are three good barometers." he added.
Regulators are expected to release national data on 1992 mortgage lending today. Preliminary information suggests that while the total number of applications increased last year - in part because of heavy refinancings - the disparity in denial rates between whites and blacks narrowed only slightly.
The HMDA data - and denial rates in particular - have become the standard by which progress in minority lending is judged. In the last few years, the industry has come under increasing pressure from regulators, the public, and law-enforcement officials to step up lending to minority consumers.
Interpreting the Numbers
HMDA data consistently show that mortgage applications from blacks are more than twice as likely to be denied as those from whites. Most agree that a huge disparity in the rate at which whites and minorities are denied mortgage applications is egregious. But economic data suggest that some of that difference can be attributed to income and credit history.
A study by the Boston Fed last year found that when many financial variables were controlled for, disparities in denial rates were lessened: Blacks were only 60% as likely to be denied mortgages as whites with similar economic status.
But even that study has not settled the debate about what disparity would be appropriate if no discrimination existed.
We still don't …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Crucial Numbers on Bias May Not Be Obvious Ones. Contributors: Cummins, Claudia - Author. Magazine title: American Banker. Volume: 158. Issue: 211 Publication date: November 3, 1993. Page number: 3. © 2009 SourceMedia, Inc. COPYRIGHT 1993 Gale Group.