Cable Television 1993: Is It the Beginning of a New Partnership between Local and Federal Government?

By Kenny, John | Public Management, October 1993 | Go to article overview

Cable Television 1993: Is It the Beginning of a New Partnership between Local and Federal Government?


Kenny, John, Public Management


In 1993, the cable industry will generate $20 billion in revenue in the United States. Will your community benefit from this $20 billion in revenue and the increase in channels from 30, 60, or 100 to the promised 500?

Will cable finally reach its potential to build for local government the last mile in the information superhighway, the mile to be traveled by voice, data, and facsimile in addition to the current flow of video entertainment? Will your community become more active in the regulation of cable television rates, services, and consumer standards, or will it leave those issues to the market or the federal government?

Will your community be involved in the decision making over whether cable companies will provide telephone services and telephone companies will offer video services? If this happens, will your community get more in franchise fees or less?

This article deals with a number of these questions and informs local government administrators of federal activity that affects their ability to participate in the rapidly moving telecommunications revolution.

Federal Versus Local Regulation

There always has been a split between the federal and local governments on the issues of who should regulate cable television and how. One thing, however, always has been clear. Because cable television companies use local streets and rights-of-way, local governments (and in some cases, state governments) have had the authority to decide who would receive a franchise to provide local cable service.

Unfortunately, the clarity has ended there. The federal government has the authority to regulate the airwaves. Local television stations use the airwaves to broadcast their signals. Because, cable systems retransmit those broadcast signals, the federal government has asserted a role in the regulation of cable television.

From 1950, when cable first started in Pennsylvania, to the mids, 1980 local governments and the federal government used a hodgepodge of rules and regulations to govern cable. In 1984, the U.S. Congress, at the urging of the cable industry, dramatically changed the rules of the game and dealt a blow to localities by essentially deregulating 97 percent of all cable franchises and minimizing the local power over rates and services.

Since deregulation, monthly rates for basic cable service have risen by a whopping 40 percent in one-quarter of the nation's cable homes--three times the rise in the consumer price index (CPI) for the comparable period. In many cases, despite increased rates, cable service has degenerated.

Because of the rate increases and a general dissatisfaction with many CATV services, the U.S. Congress last year enacted (over President Bush's veto) the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-385). A primary finding of the Congress was that "franchising authorities are finding it difficult under the current regulatory scheme to deny renewals to cable systems that are not adequately serving cable subscribers." This difficulty was due in large part to the provisions of the 1984 federal deregulation law, which had severely limited local regulation options.

The 1992 Act attempts to reverse that deregulation and provides an opportunity for local and state franchising authorities to get back into regulating cable rates and many aspects of cable service. The Act sets up procedures and standards for the franchising authority to become certified by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and contains many provisions of direct interest to local governments.

Figure 1 summarizes the 1992 Cable Act provisions that have an impact on local governments. The two most significant aspects affecting local government regulation of cable are rate regulation and customer service standards.

Figure 1

The 1992 Cable Television Act's Impact on Local Governments

* Prevents the granting of exclusive franchises, as has so far been customary, and encourages the awarding of competitive franchises. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Cable Television 1993: Is It the Beginning of a New Partnership between Local and Federal Government?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.