The Global System of Finance: Scanning Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann for Theoretical Keystones

By Hessling, Alexandra; Pahl, Hanno | The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, January 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Global System of Finance: Scanning Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann for Theoretical Keystones


Hessling, Alexandra, Pahl, Hanno, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology


Introduction

HOW CAN WE EXPLAIN a seemingly limitless growth of financial transactions that "is close to 1500 trillion dollars a day, which is more than seventy times the daily volume of international trade of goods" (Goldfinger 2000: 72)? Does the rapid growth of stock markets mirror economic reality (Lowenstein 1988)? What do we observe: One single defining trend? The shift from tangible to intangible, where the economic landscape is no longer shaped by physical flows of material goods and products but by streams of data, images, and symbols (Goldfinger 2002)? And do those streams of data, images, and symbols exist for and refer to the "real" economy of tangibles? If so, the question is how they interact with the real economy.

The academic bazaar of explanations and interpretations of the evolution of the financial system and its impact on the economy is dazzling and multicolored. Some enthusiastic scholars pronounce that the financial system fosters efficient resource allocation. They grasp the financial economy as a vehicle of creative destruction that promotes innovation and eliminates obstacles to development and growth. Other critical thinkers agree on the destructive nature of money but paint a far more pessimistic picture: they proclaim the financialization of the economy, where financial assets replace and destroy physical assets (Froud et al. 2000; Fligstein and Shin 2004; Stockhammer 2004). Most economists clearly reject this view and instead dedicate their research to verifying and explaining positive correlations between financial market development and economic growth. And indeed, most empirical investigations suggest strong two-way linkages. But classical concepts of asymmetric information, financial liberalization, and market efficiency--notwithstanding their explanatory potential--have answered only too few questions. And many other issues need to be addressed on other theoretical grounds than economics.

What does sociology contribute to understanding the relationship of society, economy, and finance? As early as about half a century ago, Parsons and Smelser (1956) declared that sociology has tools that can help explain noneconomic phenomena in economic settings. And programmatically they noticed that "much study is needed to probe to deeper levels of understanding, but it is a very promising field" (1956: 239). Since then, sociologists have contributed various theoretical approaches to understanding social phenomena and mechanisms in the economic and financial settings of our society. Despite their different epistemological backgrounds, they basically share the idea of modern finance as a social reality sui generis. Anthony Giddens (1990: 21ff.), for instance, perceives financial markets as a central aspect of what he calls the disembedding of social systems, a lifting out of social relations from local and national contexts. In the same way, Manuel Castells (1989, 1996) talks about spaces of flows to conceive the development of strong ties between social actors who are spatially divided, and first of all, he makes reference to financial markets. These spaces of flows bear similarities to Saskia Sassen's (1999) spatio-temporal configurations of dematerialized/digital activities of finance on the one hand and materialized activities on the other. But while Sassen claims interacting and overlapping spatial and temporal orders, advocates of postmodern approaches disagree with interactions, and instead declare the uncoupling of financial markets from the "real" economy (Heine 2001). Along these lines and to put it into metaphorical words, financial markets don't mirror economic reality. They are halls of mirrors, "where reflections of reflections, images of images constitute the only reality that matters" (McGoun 1997: 111). Drawing on Jean Baudrillard's (1983) philosophical works, the hyperreality of finance (McGoun 1997) is proclaimed. Finance has become a "hyperreal" game, an emergent social reality that is not a reflection of the "real" economy any more.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Global System of Finance: Scanning Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann for Theoretical Keystones
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?