Nationalism and Progressive Politics in India

By Singh, Randhir | Monthly Review, November 1993 | Go to article overview

Nationalism and Progressive Politics in India


Singh, Randhir, Monthly Review


In historical terms, nationalism is not in itself progressive or reactionary, secular or communal, democratic or authoritarian, or anything else that can be expressed in simple categories of better or worse. It all depends upon its specific character, its program and leadership, and above all else, its concrete historical context. Nationalism in India before 1947 was indeed progressive, but under a different, more advanced class leadership it could have been radical, even revolutionary, because it aimed at resolving the basic structural contradictions concentrated in imperialism, whose resolution alone could clear the path for the Indian people's continuing struggle for a better future.

But nationalism need not have been so in the post-1947 period, for the settlement of 1947 had its own harsh logic. It is customary in conventional scholarship to take a liberal, linear view of the historical process in India around and after 1947. In this view, the Indian "nation-in-the-making" is seen as winning political freedom in 1947 and then moving on to win economic freedom--a movement which forty-five years hence is still on. The real historical process, however, has been dialectical. In the very manner in which the contradictions with imperialism were resolved, the transfer of power involved no basic economic or social-structural change, but put new, now Indian ruling classes in control of state power. This made the Indian people's struggle for economic freedom primarily a struggle against these new ruling classes. This is where, increasingly, the basic structural contradictions of Indian society have now come to be located. The new rulers have used the state to facilitate a historically specific form of capitalist development in the country, even as they continue to maintain many of the old exploitative and oppressive structures of Indian society.

These systemic contradictions are of decisive importance for all revolutionary strategy; though I must hasten to add that within the same systemic context, it is always possible for the ruling classes to make good or bad choices and to pursue better or worse economic, political, cultural, and other policies, and that this is a matter of great tactical significance for any revolutionary politics.

Social reality is invariably much too complex to be easily or fully understood or grasped by social theory. Marx's social theory recognized this. His achievement was to provide what still remains, with all its problems and inadequacies, the best point of entry into understanding the systemic character of social formations by suggesting that society be viewed as a totality, a historically specific, contradiction-laden structure with interdependent parts, within which one part--the economic structure--decisively conditions every other part or aspect of society: its politics, morality, culture, indeed the dynamics of its whole life.

The Indian social formation is possibly the most complex in the world, with its continental dimensions and extraordinary diversities of economic and social life, its long, relatively continuous history, its colonial legacies, and all sorts of other material, cultural, and ideological survivals from the past. For understanding the systemic character of this much-too-complex social formation, two passages from Marx, their different contexts notwithstanding, may still be helpful for their suggestiveness. He wrote: In all forms of society there is one specific kind of production which predominates over the rest, whose relations thus assign rank and influence to the others. It is the general illumination which bathes all the other colors and modifies their particularity. It is a particular ether which determines the specific gravity of every being which has materialized within it.

Elsewhere he spoke of countries which suffer not only from the development of capitalist production but also from the incompleteness of that development. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Nationalism and Progressive Politics in India
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.