The Impact of New Funding Formula on School Finance Equity in Missouri

By Wan Ko, Jang | Education, Spring 2006 | Go to article overview

The Impact of New Funding Formula on School Finance Equity in Missouri


Wan Ko, Jang, Education


School finance equity has been one of the key issues in educational policy for the past few decades. Since the 1970s, states have implemented a number of educational finance reforms in response to court orders, and political forces and public demand to equalize funding distribution among districts (Ladd, Chalk, & Hansen, 1999; Ladd & Hansen, 1999). In particular, widespread finance disparities among school districts became a legal challenge in many states. Education finance systems in 43 states had been involved in litigation between 1971 and 1999, and school funding systems in 19 of those states were declared unconstitutional (Minorini & Sugarman, 1999). These legal decisions forced states to change state funding formulas, school finance policy, or state education systems in order to improve school finance equity.

Similar to many other states, Missouri's funding formula change was primarily influenced by court decision. In 1993, the circuit court of Cole County ruled "The existing school finance system does not provide an 'equal ... opportunity' for all school age children as is required by ... the Missouri Constitution" (Committee for Educational Equity v. Missouri, 1993, p. 29). As described in the decision, "various statistical measures confirm the degree and extent of these wide inequalities" (p. 13) and "All relevant standard measures of equity ... clearly and consistently indicate that Missouri funding for its public schools is highly disequalized and is getting worse" (p. 15).

National data, furthermore, showed that Missouri was the worst state in school finance equity in the early 1990s, measured by selected equity indices. In 1992, Missouri's school finance equity indices in total revenue were 39.58 for the coefficient of variation, 1.54 for the federal range ratio, and 0.18 for the Gini Coefficient (Parrish, Hikido, & Fowler, 1998). Among the 49 states, excluding Hawaii, which has only one school district, Missouri had the highest scores in all three equity indices, showing the very wide disparities across districts in the state.

This finance funding inequality had been an issue during the 1980s. Although Missouri revised its school funding formula twice, in 1969 and 1977, to improve finance equity, "the formula was vastly under-funded and was not serving the equalization purpose for which it was originally designed" (Lamb, 1997, p. 59). In 1992, state lawmakers started to redesign the school finance system in anticipation of a court decision that would be overturned, increasing the demand on equal distribution of school funding. A few months after the court decision declaring the school funding system unconstitutional, the Missouri legislature adopted the Outstanding Schools Act in 1993, which established new programs and policies to significantly improve the quality of education and local school districts' accountability. One of the important elements of the Act was to introduce a new foundation funding formula designed to raise additional state revenue of nearly $400 million for schools and to ensure greater finance equity in the allocation of basic state aid to school districts (Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, 2001).

The new foundation formula is driven by the local school district's eligible pupil count, times a guaranteed tax base, times the local general operating tax rate. This formula introduced several important features to bring about school funding equity (The Office of State Auditor of Missouri, 2003; Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, 1999; Ogle, 1999). First, the foundation formula used a guaranteed tax base (GTB) in the calculation of a district's entitlement. The GTB is designed to equalize the revenue-raising ability of each school district, at least up to some point (Odden & Picus, 2004) In the previous formula, GTB was an add-on used to reward districts that levied higher tax rates, but the new formula put equal emphasis on a foundation (Lamb, 1997). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Impact of New Funding Formula on School Finance Equity in Missouri
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.