User Fees to Fund Faster Reviews

By Henkel, John | FDA Consumer, October 1993 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

User Fees to Fund Faster Reviews

Henkel, John, FDA Consumer

The road to gaining FDA approval to market a new prescription drug or biologic can be a lengthy one. By law, FDA must review clinical test results for any new drug or biologic to ensure the product is safe and effective. Because of staff shortages, limited resources, and incomplete submitted applications, it takes an average of 22 months for approval from the time companies apply to market products. But that is about to change.

Resources provided by the Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 will help FDA shorten review time significantly over the next five years. The agency has started collecting "user fees"--charges levied on pharmaceutical companies for certain new drug and biologic applications, drug products, and manufacturing establishments covered under the act. FDA will use these funds to hire more reviewers to assess applications. At the same time, the agency is streamlining drug and biologic review processes. (See "FDA Finds New Ways to Speed Treatments to Patients," page 15.)

FDA hopes to employ about 700 new drug reviewers and support staff by the end of fiscal year 1997. To do this, the agency expects to collect more than $325 million in user fees over the five years covered by the 1992 act. (See chart.) Unless Congress renews the act, the user fee law will expire at the end of FY 1997.

Most new employees will work in either FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research or Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. They include medical officers, chemists, microbiologists. and pharmacologists, along with other professionals and support staff. They also will help FDA with its backlog of overdue applications, which the agency plans to eliminate within two years.

As for new applications, FDA aims to reduce review times to 12 months for "standard" applications and to six months for "priority" applications. Applications for drugs similar to those already marketed are designated standard, while priority applications represent drugs offering significant advances over existing treatments. (Drugs for AIDS and cancer typically fall into the priority category.) Goals for shortening review times and for hiring more staff will be phased in gradually over the five-year statutory period.

Although FDA is accelerating its review time, the agency remains committed to high review standards. Newly initiated programs are helping ensure the quality and integrity of the review process.

The prescription drug and biotechnology industries, particularly the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association and several biologic product trade associations, support user fees to bolster FDA's review process. About 175 drug and biologic companies are affected by the user fee law.

The pharmaceutical industry also will play a major part in helping the agency achieve user fee performance goals. For example, FDA will depend on companies to improve the overall quality of submissions and to provide timely responses to questions about applications. The agency plans to work closely with industry on programs to improve the quality of the drug and biologic submissions. FDA also will enlist information technology to help speed review of the massive amounts of data submitted in drug and biologic applications.

FDA has begun billing companies for FY 1993 fees. An FDA senior-level steering committee is guiding the transition to the fee system, while working groups handle specifics such as fee management, tracking progress toward meeting user fee performance goals, and the new staff's need for training and computers.

A Long History

User fees are not a new concept. FDA has charged fees for color certification and insulin certification for more than 40 years. FDA first considered drug review fees in 1971 when the General Accounting Office recommended to Congress that FDA charge such fees. GAO's report cited the authority federal agencies were given to levy user fees under the Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1952.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

User Fees to Fund Faster Reviews


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?