Introducing "Grassley-Baucus": Forget Schumer-Graham. This New U.S. Legislation Has Already Spawned a Strange New Renaissance of IMF Reform Proposals. Can Protectionism Be Cured?

By Zoakos, Criton M. | The International Economy, Spring 2006 | Go to article overview

Introducing "Grassley-Baucus": Forget Schumer-Graham. This New U.S. Legislation Has Already Spawned a Strange New Renaissance of IMF Reform Proposals. Can Protectionism Be Cured?


Zoakos, Criton M., The International Economy


The crude protectionist method of the Schumer-Graham bill that called for a 27.5 percent tariff on Chinese imports has been replaced by the comprehensive globalization approach of the Grassley-Baucus bill, named after the bipartisan leadership of the Senate Finance Committee, Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Max Baucus (D-Montana). Two hours alter Senators Grassley and Baucus announced their bill on March 28, Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) responded by shelving their bill for the time being. This episode may yet come to symbolize how easy it can be to turn raw protectionist sentiment into enthusiastic support for greater economic globalization--if it is done right.

Grassley-Baucus ("The United States Trade Enhancement Act of 2006," or S. 2467) opens the way for a fundamental reform of the International Monetary Fund. It provides the first elements of a legislative framework that would turn the IMF into a facilitator for market solutions and, in this way, into a tool for the accelerated globalization of the world economy. The fact that this is proposed by the bipartisan leadership of the Finance Committee of the U.S. Senate should get the attention of America's trading partners--and that doesn't mean only the Chinese. The fact that its announcement was made right before the spring meeting of the IMF suggests that it was meant to get the attention of these trading partners: IMF reform was the agreed agenda of the Fund's spring meeting.

The important stuff happens in Title II, Sections 204, 205,206, and 207 of the Grassley Baucus bill.

First, the bill repeals the Plaza Accord-era legislation that controls U.S. exchange rate policy (Subtitle A of Title III of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988). This was the law that mandated the orderly depreciation of the U.S. dollar, coordinated central bank interventions in the foreign exchange market, and offered provisions for identifying "currency manipulators." The familiar legal props for international economic coordination of the 1980s and 1990s are repealed. What is put in their place is the U.S. version of IMF reform.

Second, a seven-person committee of private sector financial and economic experts will work with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve to submit to Congress a report every six months that will determine which countries, if any, have a "'fundamentally misaligned" currency; will identify the macroeconomic and other causes of the "fundamental misalignment" (including monetary and financial conditions, capital controls, levels of investment, trade restrictions, and export dependence for growth); and will propose remedies that the offending country or countries need to take to remove these causes.

Third, following submission of the report to Congress, the Secretary of the Treasury will try to engage the offending country bilaterally and also to enlist the IMF and other multinationals to pressure such governments to adopt the kinds of economic policies that will eliminate the fundamental misalignment.

Finally, if the offending country fails to conform under such multilateral pressure, the U.S. representative at the IMF will oppose any new financing for any project in that country. Moreover, the United States will demand that the Managing Director of the IMF advise the offending country that it may be found in violation of its obligations under Article IV of the IMF Articles of Agreement, and report the matter to the IMF Executive Board for further action.

Evidently, the Grassley-Baucus bill envisages an IMF reform that will transform the Fund into an agency that deals with the problem of "fundamental misalignment" of currencies. Without such a reform of the IMR the bill would be meaningless. There are, however, rival versions of IMF reform proposals.

At one end of the spectrum is the reform vision associated with C. Fred Bergsten and the Institute of International Economics, which calls for the creation of a "New Steering Committee for the World Economy" to replace the "illegitimate" G-7--currently the failed, de facto steering committee of the world economy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Introducing "Grassley-Baucus": Forget Schumer-Graham. This New U.S. Legislation Has Already Spawned a Strange New Renaissance of IMF Reform Proposals. Can Protectionism Be Cured?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.