Lieberman Award Section 15 of the Charter and the Allocation of Resources in Health Care: A Comment on Auton V. British Columbia

By Bond, Claire | Health Law Journal, Annual 2005 | Go to article overview

Lieberman Award Section 15 of the Charter and the Allocation of Resources in Health Care: A Comment on Auton V. British Columbia


Bond, Claire, Health Law Journal


On 19 November 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v. British Columbia (Attorney General) (1). Contrary to both the lower courts, (2) the Court held that the refusal of the Province of British Columbia to fund a particular treatment for autistic children did not violate the right to equality under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). (3) As McLachlin C.J.C. explained, the issue before the Court was "not what the public health system should provide, which is a matter for Parliament and the legislature. The issue [was] rather whether the B.C. Government's failure to fund these services under the health plan amounted to an unequal and discriminatory denial of benefits under that plan, contrary to s. 15 of the Charter." (4) The petitioners, however, failed to establish that the denial of benefits violated the Charter. (5) While the government must provide services authorized by law in a non-discriminatory manner, discrimination was not established because the benefit claimed, funding for all medically required services, was not provided by law, nor had the government excluded autistic children on the basis of disability. (6)

Determining which denials of a health care service violate equality rights and which do not is a difficult task. (7) Moreover, this issue will likely continue to be "contentious ... as the availability of a growing array of new and often expensive modalities challenges those responsible for allocating limited health care budgets in a fair and efficient manner." (8) The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Auton sets an important legal precedent and framework for examining the issue of the equitable allocation of resources. This comment examines two components to this framework: "medical necessity" and the equality analysis under s. 15. After summarizing the facts and the two lower court decisions, I shall argue that the Supreme Court of Canada's analysis in Auton is consistent with prior case law, and though not groundbreaking, provides useful clarification and guidance.

Facts

The four infant petitioners suffer from autism, a neuro-behavioral syndrome caused by dysfunction of the central nervous system. (9) A 1987 study published by Dr. O. Ivar Lovaas suggested that Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) or Intensive Behavioral Invention (IBI) may help some autistic children between ages three and six. (10) This intensive therapy costs between $45,000 and $60,000 per year for a single child. (11) The petitioners and other individuals lobbied the Province of British Columbia to provide funding for the therapy. J2 At the time of trial, the government funded several programs for young autistic children and seemed to be moving toward funding some form of early intervention therapy. (13) Nevertheless, the government had not established funding for ABA/IBI therapy. (14) Among the factors contributing to the government's hesitance were financial constraint and "the emergent and somewhat controversial nature of ABA/IBI therapy." (15)

The petitioners sought a declaration that the denial of funding for Lovaas therapy (a particular type of ABA/IBI therapy) by the Ministries of Health, Education and Children and Families violated s. 7 and s. 15 of the Charter. They also sought an order of mandamus requiring the Crown to pay for the costs of past and future treatment.

Decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court

Allan J. addressed only the claim against the Ministry of Health because she considered the claim to primarily a health care issue. (16) Having thus narrowed the claim, Allan J. found that applied behavioral therapy is a "medically necessary service" for autistic children. (17) In making this finding, she rejected the Crown's "narrow definition of a 'medically necessary service' as one that must be provided by a health care practitioner." (18) Instead, she determined that a more precise definition was "whatever cures or ameliorates illness.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Lieberman Award Section 15 of the Charter and the Allocation of Resources in Health Care: A Comment on Auton V. British Columbia
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.