Protecting Free Speech for Clergy: A Bill before Congress Would Nullify Some Federal Tax Practices That Are Used to Prevent Free Speech and the Free Exercise of Religion

By Detweiler, George | The New American, May 29, 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Protecting Free Speech for Clergy: A Bill before Congress Would Nullify Some Federal Tax Practices That Are Used to Prevent Free Speech and the Free Exercise of Religion


Detweiler, George, The New American


Federal tax law discriminates against the clergy, especially as it is enforced by the Internal Revenue Service. The First Amendment guarantees both freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion. The Constitution places any restriction on either of those liberties beyond the reach of federal officers; at least that is the hierarchy of the legal system created by the Founding Fathers. Current practice is otherwise.

Lyndon Johnson's Tax Law

In 1954, then-Senator Lyndon Johnson (D-Texas) championed a bill that would amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide that churches and other religious and charitable organizations enjoying tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) could lose their tax-exempt status by participating in prohibited activities. As tax-exempt entities, donations to them are not treated as taxable income. But this benefit can be lost if a 501(c)(3) charity engages in a prohibited activity. Johnson was seeking political revenge against charitable institutions that had supported one of his opponents. In the process his amendment to the tax laws made sweeping deprivations of First Amendment guarantees to a variety charitable institutions nationwide.

In a publication entitled Tax Guide for Churches and Religious Organizations, the IRS declares about those organizations: "No substantial part of its activity may be attempting to influence legislation, [and] the organization may not intervene in political campaigns." One problem: the ruling is open to interpretation. In defining the words "substantial part," the IRS says, "Whether a church's ... attempts to influence legislation constitute a substantial part of its overall activities is determined on the basis of all the pertinent facts and circumstances in each case." The guide declares that the IRS looks at the amount of time and money devoted to the activity.

This is dangerous wording. By using phrases like "no substantial part" the job of defining what is or is not "substantial" is left to the federal bureaucracy. Experience reveals a lack of uniformity among IRS personnel as to how much and what character of activity constitutes a substantial part. The IRS publication declares, in addition to losing tax-exempt status for supporting or opposing any candidate for public office, or attempting to influence legislation: "A church .

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Protecting Free Speech for Clergy: A Bill before Congress Would Nullify Some Federal Tax Practices That Are Used to Prevent Free Speech and the Free Exercise of Religion
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?