Doctrines without Borders: Territorial Jurisdiction and the Force of International Law in the Wake of Rasul V. Bush

By Brooks, Brennan Tyler | Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, January 2006 | Go to article overview

Doctrines without Borders: Territorial Jurisdiction and the Force of International Law in the Wake of Rasul V. Bush


Brooks, Brennan Tyler, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law


ABSTRACT

Following the attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States responded with military action aimed at eradicating terrorist networks around the world. The action in Afghanistan resulted in several hundred captured enemy combatants being sent to the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Because the base is not within the territory of the United States, the Bush administration took the position that the detainees could be held indefinitely without review in civilian courts. In a surprising move, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the detainees did have a right to petition civilian courts for habeas corpus review. Thus, the habeas statute was given extraterritorial application by the Court. That decision opened the federal judiciary to these terror suspects and did so in a way that lacks clarity and that could conceivably authorize habeas review of any detention undertaken by the U.S. government anywhere in the world. In November 2005, Congress took steps to curtail the right of detainees at Guantanamo Bay to obtain habeas review, but this move did not address all of the potential sources for confusion, and in some respects the recent action of Congress has added even more ambiguity to the law. Insofar as this has the potential to greatly complicate the war on terror, Congress must consider exercising its authority to amend the habeas corpus statute further than it already has and thereby address the questions that persist.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 I.  INTRODUCTION: WHAT IS "JUSTICE" IN THE WAR
     ON TERROR?
 II. BACKGROUND CASES
     A. Ahrens v. Clark
     B. Johnson v. Eisentrager
     C. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of
        Kentucky
     D. Rasul v. Bush: Action in the Lower Courts
III. RASUL V. BUSHAT THE SUPREME COURT
     A. The Majority Opinion
     B. Justice Kennedy's Concurrence
 IV. RASUL V. BUSH--THE DISSENTING ANALYSIS OF
     THE COURT RATIONALE
     A. Justice Scalia's Dissent
        1. The Court Fails to Give Due Weight
           to the Text of [section] 2241 which Obviously
           Requires Territorial Jurisdiction
           over the Petitioner
        2. Eisentrager is Directly on Point and
           Should Apply
        3. The Court Misappropriates Braden
        4. The Court's Description of the
           Guantanamo Facility is Baseless
        5. The Court Misinterprets the History
           of the Writ
        6. Conclusion
     B. Parallel Paths and the Roads Not Taken
  V. DEVELOPMENTS SUBSEQUENT TO RASUL AND
     RECOMMENDATION
     A. Dealing with the "Breathtaking" Impact
     B. Congressional Power after Rasul
        1. The Graham-Levin Amendment on
           Guantanamo
        2. A Focus on the Jurisdiction of U.S.
           Courts
        3. The International Law Question
     C. Applying Rasul: Some Early Guidance and
        Potential Dangers
        1. Hamdan's Narrow Application of Rasul
        2. The Court's Open Door Policy
        3. Recommendation: Consider the Entire
           Context when Deciding Hamdan
 VI. CONCLUSION

Nam cetera malificia tum persequare, ubi facta sunt; hoc, nisi provideris, ne accidat, ubi evenit, frustra iudicia inplores: capta urbe nihil fit reliqui victis.

Sallust, Bellum Catilinae 52:4-5

I. INTRODUCTION: WHAT IS "JUSTICE" IN THE WAR ON TERROR?

On September 20, 2001, shortly after the U.S. government determined that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda were responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks, President George W. Bush addressed a joint session of Congress. (1) Articulating a new doctrine in foreign policy, (2) he issued the following warning: "[A]ny nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime." (3) The goal of this doctrine, which makes host nations responsible for the actions of the terrorists they harbor, was and remains the eradication of terrorist safe havens.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Doctrines without Borders: Territorial Jurisdiction and the Force of International Law in the Wake of Rasul V. Bush
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.