Should We Clone Humans? Wholeness, Individuality, Reverence

By McCormick, Richard Arthur | The Christian Century, November 17, 1993 | Go to article overview

Should We Clone Humans? Wholeness, Individuality, Reverence


McCormick, Richard Arthur, The Christian Century


THE CLONING of human embryos by Dr. Jerry L. Hall at George Washington University Medical Center last month has set off an interesting ethical debate. Should it be done? For what purposes? With what controls? It is not surprising--though I find it appalling-that some commentators see the entire issue in terms of individual autonomy. Embryos belong to their producers, they argue, and it is not society's business to interfere with the exercise of peoples privacy (see comments in the New York Times, October 26).

Ones approach to cloning will vary according to the range of issues one wants to consider. For example, some people will focus solely on the role of cloning in aiding infertile couples-- and they will likely conclude that there is nothing wrong with it. The scarcely hidden assumption is that anything that helps overcome infertility is morally appropriate. That is, I believe, frighteningly myopic.

Human cloning is an extremely social matter, not a question of mere personal privacy. I see three dimensions to the moral question: the wholeness of life, the individuality of life, and respect for life.

Wholeness. Our society has gone a long way down the road of positive eugenics, the preferential breeding of superior genotypes. People offhandedly refer to "the right to a healthy child." Implied in such loose talk is the right to discard the imperfect. What is meant, of course, is that couples have a claim to reasonably available means to ensure that their children are born healthy. We have pre-implementation diagnosis for genetic defects. We have recently seen several cases of "wrongful life" where the child herself or himself is the plaintiff. As a member of the ethics committee of the American Fertility Society, I regularly receive brochures from sperm banks stating the donors race, education, hobbies, height, weight and eye color. We are rapidly becoming a pick-and-choose society with regard to our prospective children. More than a few couples withhold acceptance of their fetuses pending further testing. This practice of eugenics raises a host of problems: What qualities are to be maximized? What defects are intolerable? Who decides? But the critical flaw in "preferential breeding"is the perversion of our attitudes: we begin to value the person in terms of the particular trait he or she was programmed to have. In short, we reduce the whole to a part. People who do that are in a moral wilderness.

Individuality. Uniqueness and diversity (sexual, racial, ethnic, cultural) are treasured aspects of the human condition, as was sharply noted by a study group of the National Council of Churches in 1984 (Genetic Engineering: Social and Ethical Consequences). Viewed theologically, human beings, in their enchanting, irreplaceable uniqueness and with all their differences, are made in the image of God. Eugenics schemes that would bypass, downplay or flatten human diversities and uniqueness should be viewed with a beady eye. In the age of the Genome Project it is increasingly possible to collapse the human person into genetic data. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Should We Clone Humans? Wholeness, Individuality, Reverence
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.