Infrastructure Deregulation and Privatization in Industrialized and Emerging Economies

By Trebing, Harry M.; Voll, Sarah P. | Journal of Economic Issues, June 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Infrastructure Deregulation and Privatization in Industrialized and Emerging Economies


Trebing, Harry M., Voll, Sarah P., Journal of Economic Issues


For the past twenty-five years a diverse group of large users of energy and telecommunications, potential entrants, and market-oriented reformers have aggressively moved to change the organization and governance of public utilities in both industrialized and developing nations. The replacement of regulated private monopoly and state-owned enterprises through privatization and deregulation has been a source of continuing controversy. This paper will examine actual experience to get a better appreciation of evidence of market and public policy failure.

Deregulation and Privatization of Energy Utilities in Industrialized Nations

The traumatic collapse of the energy markets following the Enron scandal and the California price-rigging expose led to growing evidence of market failure in the United States. Trading markets revealed a vulnerability to manipulation, preferred treatment of affiliates by parent companies, and fraudulent reporting of pricing and sales information. (1) Academic research also showed that sellers could approach joint profit maximization through trading even in the absence of direct collusion, (2) and common gaming strategies among traders could lead to forbearance and cooperation. (3) Further, it has been argued that trading markets will not assure adequate transmission capacity since hedging assumed an elasticity of supply that was nonexistent and trading could easily be distorted by incentives to maintain profits through congestion and foreclosure of rivals. Similarly, there were growing doubts about the ability of generation capacity markets to ensure adequate reserve margins.

More important, after the collapse of 2000, the electric utility industry in the United States divided itself into two categories. The first consisted of strong asset-based utilities that were capable of capturing all of the network and coordination economies (4) previously held under regulation, while at the same time acquiring significantly greater market power through a selective program of mergers and acquisitions. (5) The second category of firms was those which had aggressively diversified into nonregulated activities, especially trading, and significantly expanded into markets outside of their service territory. By 2003, these firms were in desperate financial straits, most facing financial reorganization or bankruptcy. Similarly, the rapid growth and decline of independent merchant generators cast serious doubt on the sustainability of a competitive wholesale electricity market and the credibility of market-based rates. By 2004, independent generators had been significantly displaced by acquisition programs of the asset-based utilities, their unregulated affiliates, or by private equity players (to be discussed later).

Critics now charged that deregulation did not lower prices for industrial or for residential customers, (6) improve service, or resolve major environmental problems. (7) Of particular interest, the highly conservative free-market CATO Institute viewed electricity deregulation as a failure and recommended as a second best solution the re-introduction of traditional regulation. (8)

In the United Kingdom, Steve Thomas reviewed the British model for creating competition and found significant deficiencies in competitive generation, the concentration of generation and retail functions, the claims of alleged superiority of private over public ownership, and the development of a credible wholesale market that would not burden retail markets. (9) Catherine Price concluded, "Since it is doubtful even whether consumers have benefited from competition (in the UK), it is very difficult to argue that overall welfare has increased." (10)

Deregulation and Privatization in Telecommunications in Industrialized Nations

Following the WorldCom scandal and the collapse of the telecom market, two major factors dealt a devastating blow to the prospects for intra-industry competition in telecommunications in the United States.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Infrastructure Deregulation and Privatization in Industrialized and Emerging Economies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?