How Do Embedded Agents Engage in Institutional Change?

By Burns, John; Nielsen, Klaus | Journal of Economic Issues, June 2006 | Go to article overview

How Do Embedded Agents Engage in Institutional Change?


Burns, John, Nielsen, Klaus, Journal of Economic Issues


Institutional theories offer more insight into the processes that explain institutional stability than those that explain institutional change. This article starts by elaborating this general diagnosis and proceeds with a more specific focus on institutional change in organizations. Much institutional research focuses on the relative stability of organizational practices over time (Burns and Scapens 2000). Notwithstanding that such research usually acknowledges that institutional change can occur, a major scholarly challenge is to further conceptualize and seek empirical evidence for when, why, and how organizational actors influence change while embedded in the institutional fabric of their organizational setting.

Theories of Institutional Change

John L. Campbell (2004) has identified three major problems in theories of institutional change: change, mechanisms, and ideas. The problem of change arises from the lack of specification of the dependent variable, in other words, the type of change to be studied. The relevant dimensions of change and the timeframes of the study need to be specified. The problem of mechanisms is the lack of specification of the processes that account for causal relationships among variables. In this respect existing theories are generally characterized by either vagueness, an emphasis on correlations, or functionalist accounts. Finally, the problem of ideas relates to the lack of specification of the ways in which ideas constrain and facilitate institutional change. Campbell (1998, 2004) has stressed how ideas provide agents with theories and concepts that cognitively and normatively both constrain and enable institutional change.

Contemporary theories of institutional change are characterized by an explanatory bias toward the status quo as well as by poorly specified mechanisms of change. In addition, the type of change being discussed is seldom specified, and although the role of ideas is increasingly in focus this is still a relatively underdeveloped theme.

Douglass C. North has explicitly identified a bias toward the status quo. The impact of existing institutions on the pay-off matrices of the actors makes them most often prefer re-contracting within existing institutions rather than investment of resources in processes of institutional change (1990). The literature on "varieties of capitalism" (Hall and Soskice 1998) is rightly criticized for its focus on the self-reinforcing impact of institutional complementarities and its failure to understand processes of radical institutional transformations. The literature on path dependence similarly stresses feedback mechanisms, increasing returns, and network externalities that constrain processes of change along a path except from certain critical conjunctures (Pierson 1999). Other theories stress how legitimacy concerns, uncertainty, and lack of knowledge tend to make institutional change more or less similar in spite of variety of conditions (DiMaggio and Powell 1991). This institutional isomorphism explains the prevalence of imitation and similarity but not the change that initiates such processes in the first place.

Whereas orthodox economics perceives of institutional change as relatively smooth efficiency-enhancing adaptations to new conditions, institutional theories stress not only the inertia of institutions but also how the processes of change are partly formed by mechanisms such as power relations, chance, or contagion (Nielsen and Koch forthcoming 2006). A classical theme in theories of institutional change concerns the inertia of institutions in relation to the opportunities for improvement offered by new knowledge and new technology. Thorstein Veblen stressed the regressive role of institutions and distinguished between institutionalized behavior embedded in power relations and legitimized through tradition and the past, and behavior guided by matter-of-fact knowledge oriented toward the future (Waller 1994).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

How Do Embedded Agents Engage in Institutional Change?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.