Constitutional Distortion or Heresy?

Manila Bulletin, July 2, 2006 | Go to article overview

Constitutional Distortion or Heresy?


Byline: MANUEL (Lolong) M. LAZARO President, Philippine Constitution Association

A CONSTITUTION is the embodiment of a "society's fundamental values" and "particular vision of a good and achievable community life." (Walter F. Murphy, James E. Fleming and William F. Harris, American Constitutional Interpretation, New York: The Foundation Press, Inc., 1986, p. 1). Cognizant of the Constitution's paramount importance, Frederick Stimson, the noted author of the book "American Constitution," intoned/accentuated that the framing of the Constitution is the 'highest political act.' (at pp. 8 and 9). Once framed, the Constitution becomes integral to national life. Thus, the French philosopher, Jean Jacques Rousseau, intellectually cerebrated in forceful and felicitous prose, that the Constitution "is not graven on tablets of marble but on the hearts of the citizens."

Yet, no Constitution is ever perfect, much less clairvoyant to predicts and adapt to all the changing tides of human affairs. It requires amendment or revision from time to time. The Constitution itself provides for its own process of amendment or revision. This amendatory process is a supreme political process reserved exclusively and ultimately for the sovereign people to exercise. It is exercised purposely to embody, express and affectuate the supreme will of the people. This is the lawful kernel of "people power" that was institutionalized in the present Constitution (See Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority vs. COMELEC, 262 SCRA 492).

Cha-cha is reserved exclusively for the sovereign people through their chosen representatives to exercise

Participation of the people through their duly elected representatives is the very essence of the political process of constitutional amendment or revision. Only the representatives of the people chosen for the purpose may speak for the people. Others not chosen directly by the people cannot faithfully reflect the people's will. They can only surmise or theorize. They cannot assume a pseudo-active role of speaking for the people. Such is an imperious deceit and a well-bred fraud. Their pretense subverts the people's will. The sovereign people, not the selfanointed leaders, politicians or mobilized groups, has the final say on when the Constitution may be amended or revised and who will undertake such preeminent function.

Vexing questions

Beset by political and economic crises, the nation seeks for an answer or a solution. Among the raging polemical questions confronting and dividing the nation today in the face of mounting and myriad problems are: (a) whether now is the right time and opportune occasion to amend or revise the Constitution? (b) what is the most democratic and least politicized vehicle to amend or revise the Constitution and address the numerous and varied issues emanating or radiating therefrom? These vexing questions, sired by the rush of events and the personalities involved, have assumed multi-dimensional suspicion and distrust. Proponents of Charter change (Cha-cha) have uttered malleable remarks garbed with teasing imprecision suggesting that the proposed amendments or revisions are the necessary cures to the problems of the nation today and the engine to prosperity. Rhetorics collide with body language evoking conflicting fuzzy and mystic impressions. And embedded in the rush for "Cha-cha," to use the term of Hegel, "is the cunning of reason." In the realm of politics, the moment of temptation is the moment of choice or action. Political hypocrisy is more seductive and lucrative than political honesty.

Aesthetic formulation

The reported "aesthetic creativity" formulated by the House of Representatives (House), in its resolute stance to propose amendments to, or revisions of the Constitution, with or without the participation of the Senate, upon a vote of three-fourths of all members of Congress, whether voting singly or separately, acting as constituent assembly, is a classic illustration of constitutional heresy or distortion embellished by tour de force arguments wrapped in wrinkled language. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Constitutional Distortion or Heresy?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.