Student-Faculty Informal Interaction and the Effect on College Student Outcomes: A Review of the Literature

By Lamport, Mark A. | Adolescence, Winter 1993 | Go to article overview

Student-Faculty Informal Interaction and the Effect on College Student Outcomes: A Review of the Literature


Lamport, Mark A., Adolescence


An underlying assumption for many in American higher education is that there is a relationship between student and faculty that extends beyond formal interaction. Educationally, the notion seems sound. The value of college transcends the transmission of factual material in the classroom. Knowledge is not the exclusive end of education, but a part of the process in which students learn more about society and self.

Sociologically, support is being given to various "cultures" within the college experience that socialize students' values, attitudes, and beliefs. In the last quarter century, researchers have begun to explore the informal nature of student-faculty relationships.

In the earlier days of this research, investigators were concerned with the general nature of the college experience. For example, implications of going to college were compared with not going to college, but with the expanding opportunities in higher education and institutional diversity, the question of college impact is becoming one of the comparative impact of different types of college experiences (Astin, 1970b). Further, inquiries are conducted comparing the effects of students who are residents and nonresidents, traditional age and older reentry students, attenders of large public universities and smaller private colleges, and high-interacting and low-interacting student-faculty informal experiences.

In short, questions on student-faculty informal interaction are moving from what happens to how and why, and from the amount of interaction to the quality of student-faculty relationships.

Although empirical articles on the role of student-faculty interaction are abundant (Alchiatore & Alchiatore, 1979; Davis & Young, 1982; Kestor, 1975; Meloy, 1986; Oramaner, 1981; Reinfeld, 1976; Rhodes, 1975; Sinclair, 1977; Smith, 1976), a growing body of theoretical research is emerging.

This review of the literature is organized under the following headings: (1) Faculty as Agents of Socialization, (2) Academic Achievement, (3) Satisfaction with College, (4) Intellectual and Personal Development, (5) Persistence and Attrition, (6) Career and Educational Aspiration, (7) Faculty Interpersonal Characteristics, (8) Classroom Atmosphere and Evaluation.(1)

A review of research methodology for college student outcomes is also presented.

Faculty as Agents of Socialization

According to the literature, faculty members do influence student outcomes both positively and negatively (Chickering, 1969; Endo & Harpel, 1981; Feldman & Newcomb, 1969; Jacob, 1957; Terenzini, Theophilides, & Lorang, 1984). Though research on college outcomes has increased, there are few empirical studies on student-faculty interaction. As a result, researchers know that certain general types of college experiences may be associated with certain general outcomes, yet little is understood about the specific nature of the interaction which leads to the observed outcomes (Pascarella, 1985).

Jacob's (1957) summary of the literature on the impact of teachers cites evidence that the quality of teaching has little effect on the value outcomes of general education for the majority of students. Elsewhere Jacob concedes that some teachers do exert a profound influence on some students:

Faculty influence appears more profound at institutions where association between faculty and students is normal and frequent, and students find teachers receptive to unhurried conversations out of class. (Jacob, 1957, p. 8)

Feldman and Newcomb (1969) conclude that where both the influence of student peers and of faculty complement and reinforce each other, there is potential for faculty impact. Thus, as faculty take on an increasingly significant quality relationship in the students' social environment, the more likely are the students to be influenced by faculty attitudes and other socializing variables (Pascarella, 1980).

Close student-faculty interaction is identified as being of varying significance in the college socialization process.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Student-Faculty Informal Interaction and the Effect on College Student Outcomes: A Review of the Literature
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.