Measuring Organizational Confidence: A New Way to Tackle Organizational Change in Corrections

By Bohn, James G.; Douthitt, Robert et al. | Corrections Today, June 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Measuring Organizational Confidence: A New Way to Tackle Organizational Change in Corrections

Bohn, James G., Douthitt, Robert, Eggers, John T., Corrections Today

Organizations continually seek new ways to evaluate performance. Leadership evaluations, performance-management assessments, 360-degree feedback, employee surveys and employee focus groups are some of the performance measurement tools used today. Yet, in spite of the various tools available, a key factor, organizational efficacy, is missing in this process.

Most of these tools focus on the individual. As such, they are limited in scope with regard to their effectiveness. For example, leadership evaluations tend to focus on a few individuals and their impact on the organization. Missing is the organization's view of its own capabilities, a view of organizational efficacy, and employee perspectives on the effectiveness of the organization as a whole as opposed to its individual components.

J.G. Bohn (1) defined organizational efficacy as a generative capacity within an organization to cope effectively with the demands, challenges, stressors and opportunities that it encounters within the business environment. Otherwise referred to as the "three factor solution," organizational efficacy exists as an aggregated judgment of the organization's individual members about their sense of collective capacities, their sense of mission or purpose/future, and their sense of resilience. In an organization, the three factor solution encompasses the following:

* A sense of collective capacity: Can we work together to accomplish the goal?

* A sense of mission or purpose/future: Do we know where we are going?

* A sense of resilience: Are we capable to stay the course or are we unable to adapt to our situation?

Corrections Organizational Efficacy Questionnaire (COEQ)

Stanford professor Albert Bandura, Ph.D., (2) developed the concept of self-efficacy as one's assessment of one's capability to bring about outcomes and to manage stressors. In simplest terms, self-efficacy is a sense of "can do."

Our research has taken the concept of self-efficacy to an organizational level to develop a new tool, the Corrections Organizational Efficacy Questionnaire (COEQ), to help correctional administrators, human resource teams and performance managers evaluate organizational performance. Using the research conducted by Bohn, (3) the authors of this article and a small number of personnel at the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) Academy, modified Bohn's existing questionnaire, which focused on manufacturing organizations, to one that corresponded with the specific challenges in today's correctional environment.

The COEQ uses the three-factor solution to allow researchers and practitioners to focus on specific areas for organizational improvement. Modifying Bohn's organizational efficacy questionnaire included adapting his original scale items so that the questionnaire, overall, would address the issues facing corrections.

The Study

The intent of the research was to compare the newly developed COEQ scales with Bohn's original Organizational Efficacy Scale (OES) in an attempt to validate the new scales. Knowing that the original scales were reliable and valid, the authors were able to analyze the collected corrections organizational efficacy data from the respondents in the study. The scales revealed both validity and reliability and were analyzed accordingly.

The COEQ was tested with eight correctional agencies that participated in the NIC Management Development for the Future (MDF) program. The study comprised mid-level managers from seven state departments of correction and one large jail system. Participants were not new to supervision and had been employed at their institutions for some time. Thus, their experiences allowed them to make effective and accurate judgments of the efficacy of their correctional agency.

At the time of the study, the participating agencies faced similar organizational changes and challenges. Changes in top leadership, budget cuts and program shifts highlighted the one constant as change itself.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Measuring Organizational Confidence: A New Way to Tackle Organizational Change in Corrections


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?