Cognitive Architectures and General Intelligent Systems

By Langley, Pat | AI Magazine, Summer 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Cognitive Architectures and General Intelligent Systems

Langley, Pat, AI Magazine

The Need for General Intelligent Systems

The original goal of artificial intelligence was the design and construction of computational artifacts that combined many cognitive abilities in an integrated system. These entities were intended to have the same intellectual capacity as humans and they were supposed to exhibit their intelligence in a general way across many different domains. I will refer to this research agenda as aimed at the creation of general intelligent systems.

Unfortunately, modern artificial intelligence has largely abandoned this objective, having instead divided into many distinct subfields that care little about generality, intelligence, or even systems. Subfields like computational linguistics, planning, and computer vision focus their attention on specific components that underlie intelligent behavior, but seldom show concern about how they might interact with each other. Subfields like knowledge representation and machine learning focus on idealized tasks like inheritance, classification, and reactive control that ignore the richness and complexity of human intelligence.

The fragmentation of artificial intelligence has taken energy away from efforts on general intelligent systems, but it has led to certain types of progress within each of its subfields. Despite this subdivision into distinct communities, the past decade has seen many applications of AI technology developed and fielded successfully. Yet these systems have a "niche" flavor that differs markedly from those originally envisioned by the field's early researchers. More broadly based applications, such as human-level tutoring systems, flexible and instructable household robots, and believable characters for interactive entertainment, will require that we develop truly integrated intelligent systems rather than continuing to focus on isolated components.

As Newell (1973) argued, "You can't play twenty questions with nature and win." At the time, he was critiquing the strategy of experimental cognitive psychologists, who studied isolated components of human cognition without considering their interaction. However, over the past decade, his statement has become an equally valid criticism of the fragmented nature of AI research. Newell proposed that we move beyond separate phenomena and capabilities to develop complete models of intelligent behavior. Moreover, he believed that we should demonstrate our systems' intelligence on the same range of domains and tasks as handled by humans, and that we should evaluate them in terms of generality and flexibility, rather than success on a single domain. He also viewed artificial intelligence and cognitive psychology as close allies with distinct yet related goals that could benefit greatly from working together. This proposal was linked closely to his notion of a cognitive architecture, an idea that I can best explain by contrasting it with alternative frameworks.

Three Architectural Paradigms

Artificial intelligence has explored three main avenues to the creation of general intelligent systems. Perhaps the most widely known is the multi-agent systems framework (Sycara 1998), which has much in common with traditional approaches to software engineering. In this scheme, one develops distinct modules for different facets of an intelligent system, which then communicate directly with each other. The architecture specifies the inputs/outputs of each module and the protocols for communicating among them, but places no constraints on how each component operates. Indeed, the ability to replace one large-scale module with another equivalent one is viewed as an advantage of this approach, since it lets teams develop them separately and eases their integration.

One disadvantage of the multi-agent systems framework is the need for modules to communicate directly with one another. Another paradigm addresses this issue by having modules read and alter a shared memory of beliefs, goals, and other short-term structures.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Cognitive Architectures and General Intelligent Systems


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?