The Poetics of Impossibility: Diamela Eltit's El Padre Mio

By Lazzara, Michael J. | Chasqui, May 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Poetics of Impossibility: Diamela Eltit's El Padre Mio


Lazzara, Michael J., Chasqui


At a certain point, it became clear that testimony contained at its core an essential lacuna; in other words, the survivor bore witness to something it is impossible to bear witness to. (Giorgio Agamben)

[Schizophrenics] destroy imposed speech, which is violating in its claims to proper, exclusive, totalitarian meaning ... They explode that meaning which for them had always been meaningless--in order to get back down to, and play around with, its categorical and lexical components, its underlying articulations. (Luce Irigaray)

El padre mio, Madness and the Limits of Witnessing

Diamela Eltit's (1949) avant-garde aesthetic projects, written during the years of dictatorship and postdictatorship in Chile, have received abundant critical attention that, in general, has focused on certain key elements of her poetics: marginality and exclusion, the deployment of unstable speaking positions, panoptical vigilance and the feminine, the body as a site of domination and resistance, and the use of fragmented aesthetic forms as a strategy for intervening ordered power systems. While keeping these elements in mind, I would like to focus here on Eltit's exploration of the limits of witnessing by studying her first incursion into the testimonial genre, El padre mio (1989). In a postdictatorial context dominated by manifold testimonial voices offering truths about trauma and political violence under Pinochet, Eltit's book urges us to consider alternative ways of reading testimony. Her transcription and framing (in her prologue) of the broken poetics of a schizophrenic, homeless vagabond offers the reader an image of testimony not as a simple collection of facts or data, but as a literary or metaphorical constellation of meanings that symbolically reflect a moment of socio-political and subjective crisis. I am interested in how Eltit's textual project avoids transparency at every turn, forcing readers to understand testimony's layered meanings as well as the very difficulties of communicating traumatic experience--difficulties which, as I will argue, she transforms into a personal poetics of the impossibility of speaking trauma. After a few words of introduction to contextualize Eltit's project, I will organize my discussion around three key questions. First, how does El padre mio dramatize the tension between the possibility and impossibility of speaking trauma? Second, where are we to locate the notion of "truth" in relation to the loco's discourse? (1) And third, who bears witness in El padre mio?

More than thirty years after the military coup of September 11, 1973, Chile has made great strides in coming to terms with its traumatic past. Certain recent developments, including the Lagos administration's 2004 publication of the Informe Valech (a report containing over 30,000 testimonial accounts that detail for the first time the Pinochet regime's use of torture as a state-sponsored practice), the attainment of justice in various landmark human rights cases, the inauguration of Michelle Bachelet in 2006, the prosecution of the former dictator and his family following the Riggs Bank scandal, and a series of recent reforms to Pinochet's 1980 constitution, have all proven positive signs. At the same time, many perpetrators still walk the streets unpunished, more than 1000 former Allende supports remain "disappeared," and many competing narratives about the Pinochet years still circulate in Chilean society.

Though today debate and dissent over historical memory are possible in Chile, this was much less the case during the dictatorship when opposing voices were silenced through torture, censorship, exile and disappearance. (2) With the dawn of the transition in 1990, the question of who should bear witness took on vital importance. We can recall the dispute that ensued in the wake of the Aylwin administration's (1990-1994) Truth and Reconciliation Commission, whose mandate was to report only on "the most serious violations of human rights resulting in death and disappearances" (Rettig et al.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Poetics of Impossibility: Diamela Eltit's El Padre Mio
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?