Advising for Impact: Lessons from the Rae Review on the Use of Special-Purpose Advisory Commissions

By Clark, Ian D.; Trick, David | Canadian Public Administration, Summer 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Advising for Impact: Lessons from the Rae Review on the Use of Special-Purpose Advisory Commissions

Clark, Ian D., Trick, David, Canadian Public Administration


Ontario's recent Postsecondary Review (Rae review), led by former premier Bob Rae, was dramatically more successful than any of the nine previous reviews of special-purpose advisory commissions on postsecondary education conducted in Ontario in the last thirty-five years. The purpose of this paper is to identify the Rae review's success factors and to speculate on the lessons to be drawn for future special-purpose policy advisory commissions.

The detailed policy measures recommended by the Rae review have been comprehensively analysed in this journal by David M. Cameron. As Mr. Cameron notes, the Rae review appeared after a decade when "a growing chorus of voices" reflected on the longer-term consequences of declining provincial support for postsecondary education. (1)

We would assess success in terms of the extent to which a commission's recommendations are implemented in a timely way. (2) Mr. Rae tabled his final report on 7 February 2005. On 11 May 2005, the Ontario finance minister tabled a budget that featured "the McGuinty government's Reaching Higher plan for higher education in Ontario." Although the government deferred its decision on tuition policy until the completion of further consultations with stakeholders, the Reaching Higher plan closely followed the Rae recommendations in most areas, including student assistance, operational funding, graduate education, apprenticeship and training, and the creation of a Higher Education Quality Council. It committed double-digit annual expenditure increases to the sector in a budget that saw the expenditures of fifteen ministries cut or held to below inflation. In its impact on public policy, the commission process must be judged a resounding success.

We suggest that success for special-purpose advisory commissions is dependent on environmental variables (such as the state of the economy, the fiscal situation and the political cycle), process variables (such as reporting relationships, characteristics of the commissioners and the approach taken by stakeholders) and the political acuity with which the commission develops a set of recommendations that can command broad public support.

For the purpose of this paper, a special-purpose advisory commission can be considered to be any time-limited independent body created by government in order to provide advice to government. In Ontario, such bodies have been called task forces, commissions, committees and advisory panels. Sometimes these bodies are created by cabinet order, but the more common practice in recent years has been to appoint them by authority of the minister. The Rae review was technically a mandate given to a single person, called the advisor to the premier and the minister of training, colleges and universities, with a seven-person advisory panel to advise the advisor.

Since the 1970s, governments from all three parties in Ontario have established external commissions to advise on ways to bridge the gap between the government's tepid funding for postsecondary education and its ambitions for a high level of student accessibility. Various commissions have recommended stronger planning and coordination, higher government grants, higher or deregulated tuition fees, or--in the extreme--the closure of several universities if this were necessary so that adequate funding could be supplied to the others. Beginning in the 1980s, this picture was complicated by a growing recognition of the contribution of university research to economic development, leading to recommendations that universities with large sponsored research programs should receive enhanced funding or should be permitted to reduce their student enrolments without losing funding. Several reports in the late 1980s and 1990s drew attention to the efficiencies that might be possible if students could transfer more easily from college to university, or vice versa. Other reports pondered how to improve the governance of the postsecondary education system, either through greater centralization or a more vigorous role for boards of governors.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Advising for Impact: Lessons from the Rae Review on the Use of Special-Purpose Advisory Commissions


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?