Confidentiality in Therapeutic Relationships: The Need to Develop Comprehensive Guidelines for Mental Health Professionals

By Kampf, Annegret; McSherry, Bernadette | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, April 2006 | Go to article overview

Confidentiality in Therapeutic Relationships: The Need to Develop Comprehensive Guidelines for Mental Health Professionals


Kampf, Annegret, McSherry, Bernadette, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law


This article explores the current ethical and legal standards concerning confidentiality in therapeutic relationships. It examines the existing literature concerning mental health professionals' experiences and attitudes towards confidentiality as well as patients' expectations. It argues that the existing standards are complex and confusing. It is suggested that there is a real need for comprehensive guidelines as to the circumstances in which confidentiality may be breached in order to help mental health professionals provide the best possible health care to their patients. The article outlines the methodology of a project funded by the Australian Research Council which aims to provide comprehensive guidelines for mental health professionals in this area.

**********

Mental health professionals are confronted with a wide range of ethical and legal issues concerning confidentiality in therapeutic relationships. Their practice frequently intersects with other disciplines, which can lead to conflicts in maintaining confidentiality. For example, from the criminal justice perspective, questions may arise as to whether mental health professionals can maintain the confidentiality of patient information or whether they must comply with police or court requests for access to health records or reports. A related issue is whether mental health professionals should breach confidentiality in relation to patients they consider at risk of harming themselves or others.

Mental health professionals also need to know the limits of confidentiality when the disclosure of information is needed for purposes such as research, the administration of health care organisations, working within a treatment team or in relation to medical insurance. The difficulty in dealing with matters of confidentiality lies not only in determining in what circumstances sensitive information might be disclosed, but also in deciding to whom information must be disclosed and how much of it may be revealed.

Determining when to breach confidentiality is particularly difficult when the public interest is involved. A frequently discussed example is the dilemma of mental health professionals deciding whether to disclose information in order to warn victims or authorities where there is a risk of a patient harming others. If mental health professionals breach confidentiality contrary to ethical or legal principles, the consequences can be severe. Mental health professionals run the risk of being sanctioned by a professional body and they may face legal consequences such as a claim for negligence, breach of contract or breach of confidence.

From the perspective of patients, the disclosure of sensitive personal information may have adverse social consequences. Patients who fear that their personal information will be revealed may be reluctant to disclose certain information, despite openness being essential for effective diagnosis and treatment in mental health care. (1)

This article argues that currently, mental health professionals do not have sufficient guidance as to how to balance the protection of confidentiality and the disclosure of information. It looks at the overall ethical framework for the protection of confidentiality, including current provisions in the relevant codes of ethics and the complex interplay of recent Australian law in this area. It then outlines the methodology of a project funded by the Australian Research Council which aims to provide comprehensive guidelines for mental health professionals in this area.

The Ethical Framework

Confidentiality is generally regarded as fundamental to therapeutic relationships. There are differing schools of moral philosophy that aim to establish standards of conduct that indicate how individuals should behave in certain circumstances and the following is a necessarily brief outline of how these different schools approach the need to maintain confidentiality. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Confidentiality in Therapeutic Relationships: The Need to Develop Comprehensive Guidelines for Mental Health Professionals
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.