Missing Tax Link in Labour Policy to Attract Business

The Evening Standard (London, England), August 30, 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Missing Tax Link in Labour Policy to Attract Business


Byline: ANTHONY HILTON

IN THE first budget after Margaret Thatcher's general election victory in 1979, the Conservatives cut the top rate of income tax from an effective rate of 92% all the way down to 60%. The result in the following years was that income-tax receipts increased.

In his end-of-summer report in yesterday's Financial Times, an upbeat Chancellor pointed out how, in the early years under Labour after its 1997 victory, the tax rate on company profits, known as corporation tax, has been cut from 33% to 30%. The yield has once again gone up - but this, unfortunately, is less as a result of the incentive and more due to a much tougher attitude by Revenue & Customs to what used to be considered legitimate tax avoidance by companies.

What was missing from the Chancellor's assessment was any sign that he understands how the corporation tax landscape has changed in the years since Labour came to power - and how his tax cut of yesteryear is no longer enough to keep Britain competitive.

In the early days of the Blair Government, Britain's company tax rate was one of the lowest of any major economy. But not any more.

Analysis by the OECD, the Parisbased research organisation, throws up a raft of countries which offer more favourable treatment, with the result that the UK has slipped rapidly down the league table. Now its corporation tax rate is above the average, and the UK is becoming progressively less attractive for tax reasons as a location for business.

This is not only a problem for those seeking to attract companies to these shores, it is also an issue for those located here whose main competitors are overseas. Perhaps if the Chancellor is not interested in a tax cut to, say, 20%, it is something the Conservatives could pursue - and stick with it even if their focus groups don't like it.

Aer Lingus set for a Buffetting WARREN BUFFETT, the head of the American Berkshire Hathaway company and arguably the world's most successful long-term investor, has a singular view of airlines and aircraft manufacture: along the lines that it would have been much better for investors, in the 100 years since the Wright Brothers first proved powered flight was possible, if someone had shot them down.

He wished the Wrights personally no harm. He was reflecting on the fact that airlines and aircraft manufacturing are far more likely to lose shareholders money than to make it.

Investors would be well advised to heed this warning before getting excited by the news that Irish stateowned airline Aer Lingus is to get its shares listed in London and Dublin. This is a remarkable turnaround, the business having been virtually bust only a few years ago, and the management deserves every credit for getting it to this point.

It has an interesting business model in combining full-service long-haul flights across the Atlantic with a competitive low-cost short-haul business on European routes. Right now both are going well and could probably be expanded. But those positive aspects operate under a black shadow that airlines share with insurance. It is a sad fact in both that the idiots in the industry are never allowed to go bust, or certainly not allowed to fail fast enough.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Missing Tax Link in Labour Policy to Attract Business
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?