Analyzing the Work of an Influential Philosopher

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), September 17, 2006 | Go to article overview

Analyzing the Work of an Influential Philosopher


Byline: Joseph Phelan, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

A specter is haunting North America the specter of Leo Strauss. His name is encountered

everywhere these days from the New York Times and National Public Radio to Wikipedia entries and the blogosphere. Many of these pieces have suggested that Strauss' work has directly affected United States foreign policy through the influence of neoconservatives connected with the Bush administration.

But, according to Yale professor Steven Smith, Strauss' fundamental priority was not so much the fostering of a particular political movement, but the understanding of the fate of Western rationalism under modern conditions.

Who was Leo Strauss and why is there so much heat and confusion about his work?

Born into a German Jewish family in 1899, Strauss was educated before and after World War I, taking his doctorate in 1921. He fled Germany in the 1930s, first for England and then the United States.

He taught for 10 years at the New School for Social Research in New York City, and then moved to the University of Chicago where for the next two decades his teaching and writing established a quiet revolution in the study of political philosophy. He died an emeritus professor at St. John's College in Annapolis, Md. in 1973.

Strauss was above all a reader of old books, ranging from his beloved Greeks such as Thucydides, Plato and Aristophanes, to the Judeo-Arabic writers of the Middle Ages, to early modern thinkers like Machiavelli, Hobbes and Spinoza. In his seminars at the University of Chicago he would typically devote a whole semester to a close reading of a single text, say a Platonic dialogue.

As Mr. Smith observes, this approach to the study of classic texts which had become to some extent museum pieces in recent generations was itself a revolution in the way political philosophy was taught in mid-century America.

Moreover, Strauss' way of reading these philosophers was so subtle and nuanced that his thought cannot be reduced to a system, doctrine or an "ism." So innovative were his studies of these authors that they have led to a radical rethinking of the intellectual foundations of the modern West, and in so doing demonstrated the importance of continual self-examination within the liberal democratic tradition as it faces the challenges of the postmodern world.

In the proverbial distinction between the hedgehog and the fox, Strauss was a hedgehog whose expertise in topics philosophical, literary, political and historical appealed to a wide range of students from different beginning points and backgrounds. Thus one cannot speak of a legacy but rather of a number of competing legacies deriving from his lifework.

Yet if there is not one way to be a Straussian, Mr. Smith identifies a common set of problems which preoccupied the master and were handed down to his students. Three of the most important are the difference between the ancients and modern philosophers, the quarrel between philosophy and poetry and most importantly, the tension between reason and revelation.

The center of Strauss' thought can be located at or near the apparently irreconcilable conflict between reason and revelation, a conflict which Strauss, following Spinoza, named the "theological-political problem" and which at one point he described as "the theme of my investigations."

Mr. Smith has previously written two books on Spinoza, so it is only natural that he should organize his book on Strauss around this problem. He entitles one section "Jerusalem," the focus of which is Strauss' writings about the Jewish tradition, and another section "Athens," which revolves around Strauss' reflections on the differences between ancient and modern rationalism.

According to Mr. Smith, the theological political problem represents for Strauss the core or beating heart of the Western tradition. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Analyzing the Work of an Influential Philosopher
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.