Equal Employment Opportunities: An Empirical Examination of Employer and Employee Attitudes in New Zealand

By Edgar, Fiona | International Journal of Employment Studies, April 2003 | Go to article overview

Equal Employment Opportunities: An Empirical Examination of Employer and Employee Attitudes in New Zealand


Edgar, Fiona, International Journal of Employment Studies


This article reports results of sex, ethnic and sectoral differences in attitudes towards Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO). It examines the level of importance New Zealand employees attach to EEO and their evaluations of the performance of EEO practice in their organisation. It also explores the relationship between EEO practice and its effect on employee attitudes. The analysis revealed that sector (public v. private) had the greatest impact on employee evaluations of the importance of EEO, while, surprisingly, sex (male v. female) accounted for a smaller proportion of the variance. Ethnic differences were not significant. No variables were found to significantly affect employees' evaluations of current organisational policy and practice.

Support for the efficacy of EEO policies and programmes at the organisational level was found, with the relationship between employee evaluations of EEO practice and work-related attitudes being highly correlated. No relationship was found between employee attitudes and the number of EEO practices operating in an organisation. From a practitioner's perspective, negative attitudes towards EEO are emerging, and it is possible the EEO strategy pursued may be the cause of these. This study found that the use of an identity-conscious strategy provoked a considerable amount of negative reaction towards targeted groups.

INTRODUCTION

Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) policies and programmes have been introduced into workplaces as a means to reduce inequality (Briar, 1994), and the enactment of EEO policies and practices is widely considered to constitute 'best' practice in Human Resource Management (HRM) (Johnson, 2000; HR Banker, 1998). There is, however, a growing body of literature that suggests employers are developing an increasingly apathetic attitude towards the practice of EEO, despite the abundance of theoretical support for its usefulness presented in the literature (Mor Barak, Cherin, and Berkman, 1998; Freedman and Bader, 1992; Cockburn, 1989). This is of concern because studies show that positive employer attitudes and employer commitment are crucial requirements for the effective implementation of EEO policies and practices (Konrad and Linnehan, 1995).

There are a variety of plausible reasons that may explain why employer support for EEO is declining. Firstly, EEO initiatives are often forced upon employers by the State as opposed to being employer driven. Secondly, there is little empirical evidence available to employers detailing the bottom-line benefits of EEO practice for the organisation (Johnson, 2000). So although the State often propagandises the desirability and benefits of EEO, for example, through establishing bodies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the very fact that it has to engage in 'selling' EEO through this type of forum suggests that the bottom-line benefits of EEO are not self-evident to employers. It is indeed possible that the generalisations that EEO tries to abolish, for example, women are more likely to take time off to look after children and therefore have higher absenteeism rates, are actually believed by employers, and thus attempts to dispel them are fruitless. A third reason for lack of employer support for EEO may be that employers simply do not see this area of HRM as a priority in their organisations.

Employees, especially benefactors of EEO, should benefit from its implementation. However, positive outcomes for employees can be compromised if programmes lack employer commitment. This can lead to programmes being poorly implemented, and create a situation where employees view EEO as being a waste of time. Support for this comes from studies that find that even those who purportedly benefit from EEO often view it as tokenism and are unappreciative (Kirton and Greene, 2000; Mor Barak et al., 1998; Jewson and Mason, 1986). Negative attitudes can also develop when identity-conscious EEO strategies (those which are aimed at assisting particular disadvantaged groups) are implemented (Konrad and Linnehan, 1995), with those who receive no benefit from EEO resenting its implementation as they see it as a flagrant abuse of favouritism. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Equal Employment Opportunities: An Empirical Examination of Employer and Employee Attitudes in New Zealand
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.