Why London Is Not Giving City Justice; Lawyer Diane Benussi, Chairman of Birmingham Forward, Explains Why Birmingham Needs a Permanent High Court

The Birmingham Post (England), September 27, 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Why London Is Not Giving City Justice; Lawyer Diane Benussi, Chairman of Birmingham Forward, Explains Why Birmingham Needs a Permanent High Court


Byline: Diane Benussi

One of the defining measures for a leading international city is the range and quality of its legal services.

In Birmingham, we can be proud of how the legal community has expanded in recent years, as well as the quality of service offered by solicitors, barristers and the judiciary.

However, there is one area in which we fall down: 40 years after the Beeching Report outlined measures for improving the administration of justice around the country. Birmingham still does not have a permanent, full status High Court.

Not only that, the number of days the High Court sits in the city is dwindling - even though it needs to be increasing to meet the demand from the legal profession, business community and, most importantly, members of the public.

The inadequate High Court provision in Birmingham means having to travel to London to attend cases and hiring solicitors and barristers based in the capital, which costs private citizens and businesses, not to mention the taxpayer, millions of pounds each year.

It makes access to justice even more difficult and discriminates against all of us who live or work outside London.

We estimate that the number of days the High Court sits in the Midlands has slumped by ten per cent in less than a decade, with the High Court in London spending 600 days deliberating on cases that concern matters relating to our region.

Last year, 36 different High Court judges sat in the Midlands for an average of seven-and-a-half weeks each. More and more cases - particularly those of a commercial nature - are not being heard by High Court judiciary, but by senior Circuit Court judges.

Of even greater concern is the fact that no public and administrative law cases are conducted here - they are all managed and heard in London. Quite apart from the inefficiencies of such a judges' 'roadshow', this raises questions of consistency and leadership in the administration of justice and in the development of the professions in Birmingham.

For more than a year, Birmingham Forward has been leading a campaign to establish a permanent, full status High Court in our city, administered by High Court judges who live and work here.

With our partners - Birmingham Law Society, St Philips Chambers, No5 Chambers and Deloitte - we are close to achieving the first step towards this.

The Appeal Court judge Lord Justice May has called an unprecedented consultation event in Birmingham for Tuesday, October 10 to assess views and the strength of feeling on the matter.

In particular, as part of his review for the Lord Chief Justice of out-of-London court resources, he is considering setting up a permanent Administrative Court - a branch of the High Court - in Birmingham.

While its name might not invoke images of Rumpole or Judge John Deed, the Administrative Court performs an increasingly important role in our democracy. It is responsible for reviewing the lawfulness of decisions or actions made by public bodies. For example, it looks at misuse of powers and supervises compliance with the Human Rights Act. It assesses claims of unfairness and even allegations of public bodies reneging on promises.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Why London Is Not Giving City Justice; Lawyer Diane Benussi, Chairman of Birmingham Forward, Explains Why Birmingham Needs a Permanent High Court
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?