Stendhal's Mina De Vanghel and the Question of Feminism (1)

By Garnier, Lucy | Nineteenth-Century French Studies, Spring-Summer 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Stendhal's Mina De Vanghel and the Question of Feminism (1)


Garnier, Lucy, Nineteenth-Century French Studies


The question of feminism is not one which has dominated the world of Stendhal studies despite the rise of feminist literary criticism in the latter half of the twentieth century. Of those most notably associated with feminism in France, only Simone de Beauvoir and Julia Kristeva approached Stendhal and his works in any great depth, whilst others such as Clara Malraux merely touched upon it. In terms of literary criticism, Richard Bolster, Ellen Constans and Maddelena Bertela remain the sole critics to have devoted an entire work to the question, whilst a relatively small number of critics have brought feminist theory to bear on Stendhal's work (2)--a critical reluctance stemming perhaps from the all too evident contradictions in Henri Beyle's attitude towards the opposite sex. Classifying a man like Stendhal is evidently a difficult task, when, on the one hand, he vigorously defends the necessity for women to be educated with the claim that if he were a "maitre d'etablir des usages, [il] donnerai[t] aux jeunes filles, autant que possible, exactement la meme education qu'aux jeunes garcons"(De l'amour 221), whilst concurrently concluding that "il n'est aucun de nous qui ne preferat, pour passer la vie avec elle, une servante a une femme savante" (De l'amour 207). The ensuing question then becomes whether to classify Henri Beyle as a feminist or an anti-feminist, and, furthermore, whether it is truly valid to attempt such categorisations retrospectively. Whereas Simone de Beauvoir unhesitatingly qualified Stendhal's writing as "feminist", judging according to modern-day standards the work of a man writing years before the word feminist even existed could be considered a questionable enterprise, as both Ellen Constans and Lisa Algazi have pointed out in their work. And if this enterprise is pursued nonetheless, which definition of feminism should be adopted? According to which criteria should he be judged, if indeed it is possible or justifiable to make such a judgement? The "feminism" of his contemporaries or our own? Feminism as the militants understand it, or feminism according to the academic critical world? But again, which militants, which academics? Feminism has become a hollow term covering a myriad of meanings, no longer sufficing alone to refer to any of them. Rather than pledging allegiance to one conception or other of what it means to be a feminist (and thus shifting the debate from the sphere of literary criticism to that of feminism itself), I prefer to take an accepted definition without political or theoretical connotations--that of the OED--and examine rather than judge Stendhal's writing in the light of that concept of feminism, for I would argue that an examination of Stendhal's attitude towards the opposite sex can yield many fruitful observations concerning his work. For this purpose I shall focus upon one of Stendhal's short stories, Mina de Vanghel, asking the following question: Cana reading of this text justify claiming that in Stendhal's writing one finds the expression of the "Advocacy of the rights of women (based on the theory of equality of the sexes)"(OED)?

The first point to be made is that, without any doubt, Mina de Vanghel takes centre stage in this short story. Stendhal has no fear in choosing a young woman as his protagonist. Simone de Beauvoir, writing about Lamiel, states:

   Il a tente une entreprise plus rare et qu'aucun romancier, je
   crois, ne s'est jamais propose: il s'est projete dans un
   personnage de femme. Il ne se penche pas sur Lamiel comme Marivaux
   sur Marianne ou Richardson sur Clarisse Harlow: il en epouse la
   destinee comme il avait epouse celle de Julien (Beauvoir 376).

This interpretation of Stendhars creation of Lamiel could easily extend to his young German heroine. Mina is the true Stendhalian soul, the individual for whom love counts above all and who is prepared to sacrifice everything for the sake of the one she loves.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Stendhal's Mina De Vanghel and the Question of Feminism (1)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?