Attitudes toward Cheating of Self and Others by College Students and Professors

By Roig, Miguel; Ballew, Carol | The Psychological Record, Winter 1994 | Go to article overview

Attitudes toward Cheating of Self and Others by College Students and Professors


Roig, Miguel, Ballew, Carol, The Psychological Record


Psychologists and educators have become increasingly concerned with the apparent rise in academic dishonesty (e.g., Collison, 1990; Janya, 1991; Kibler, 1992). Indeed, the percentages of students who report having cheated are alarming. For example, in a recent large-scale survey of over 6,000 students, Davis, Grover, Becker, and McGregor (1992) found that 76% of the students reported to have cheated in high school or college. Other studies corroborate similar levels of reported dishonesty (e.g., Greene, 1992; Haines, Kiefhoff, LaBeff, & Clark, 1986; Houston, 1986; Livosky & Tauber, 1992). Researchers have suggested a number of situational and dispositional factors which might account for the high levels of reported cheating. For example, Keller (1976; cited in Davis, Grover, Becker, & McGregor, 1992) and Singhal (1982) have reported that competition for grades was regarded by students as a major reason for cheating. Haines et al. (1986) found that cheaters tend to be immature and not committed to academics. These authors also found that students who cheat tend to "neutralize" their behavior. That is, the individual engages in a rationalization-like process the purpose of which is to guard against his/her own disapproval of the deviant behavior, as well as the disapproval of others. In a similar vein, Forsyth, Pope, and McMillan (1985) report that the external causal attributions of students who engage in academic dishonesty are greater than for those students who do not engage in such behavior. In view of these findings, we wondered about the kinds of attitudes toward cheating that students attribute to professors. Given the prevalence of cheating, do students rationalize their behavior by believing that professors have tolerant attitudes and generally condone such conduct? Recent data shows that professors sometimes ignore evidence of cheating and may consider this inaction appropriate under certain conditions (Tabachnick, Keith-Spiegel, & Pope, 1991). In fact, Haines et al. (1986) found that only 1.3% of their sample of students reported having been caught cheating. Moreover, Davis, Simon, Handler, and Miller (1992) have found that a relatively large proportion of students who admitted to having cheated (80% of high school students and approximately 50% of college students) did so on repeated occasions. As professors are required to promote academic integrity, one would expect that, in general, they hold attitudes toward cheating that are more condemnatory than the attitudes held by students. A recent study by Gardner and Melvin (1988) confirms this hypothesis. Although McLaughlin and Ross (1989) have found that high school teachers and administrators rated the seriousness of cheating behaviors significantly higher than students, other studies show general agreement between faculty and students on what specific situations constitute acts of cheating (e.g., Stern & Havlicek, 1986). For example, Livosky and Tauber (1992) did not find any significant differences between college students and professors in the degree of seriousness attributed to certain cheating behaviors, for example, premeditated vs. opportunistic cheating. In addition, these authors found that students from a private college were actually more likely than professors to view certain acts as cheating. Professors may also disagree as to what constitutes actual cheating. For example, Singhal (1982) has found that only 51% of the faculty surveyed considered copying homework or laboratory reports as cheating. This may help explain the high percentages of students who cheat on repeated occasions (Davis, Simon, Handler, & Miller, 1992).

Given these discrepancies, the question arises as to what students think are the typical college professor's attitudes toward cheating and, more importantly, whether students' perceptions of professors' attitudes differ from the actual attitudes held by professors. In line with the work of Forsyth et al. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Attitudes toward Cheating of Self and Others by College Students and Professors
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.