Rigorous Mathematical Thinking: Mediated Learning and Psychological Tools

By Kinard, James T.; Kozulin, Alex | Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, Summer 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Rigorous Mathematical Thinking: Mediated Learning and Psychological Tools


Kinard, James T., Kozulin, Alex, Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics


Abstract

The proposed rigorous mathematical thinking paradigm is based on two theories of learning: Vygotsky's sociocultural theory, with particular emphasis on his concept of psychological tools as mediators of cognitive processes, and Feuerstein's theory of Mediated Learning Experience. We examine the role of higher-order mental processes and psychological tools in rigorous mathematical thinking and analyze empirical data on cognitive and academic performance outcomes of the cognitively based program aimed at producing conceptual change in the underachieving students' comprehension of the mathematics concept of function.

Introduction

The proposed rigorous mathematical thinking (RMT) paradigm consists of two major components. The first in the RMT approach (Kinard, 2001; Kinard & Falik, 1999) drives concept development and applications in mathematics, science, and technology education. The second component is an instructional practice that implements RMT principles in classroom instruction. The RMT theory and its instructional pedagogy are based on two theories of learning: Vygotsky's socio-cultural (Vygotsky and his early followers used the term cultural historical) theory, with particular emphasis on his concept of psychological tools as mediators of cognitive processes, and Feuerstein's (1990) theory of Mediated Learning Experience.

In this article we will examine the role of higher-order mental processes and psychological tools in rigorous mathematical thinking that promotes students' conceptual change in classroom learning situations. In addition, we will describe and discuss empirical data on cognitive and academic performance outcomes of the cognitively based program aimed at producing conceptual change in the students' comprehension of the mathematical concept of function.

Need for Rigorous Thought in Mathematics

There is deep concern in the U.S. that American mathematics and science education is falling well behind that of other industrialized societies. This is manifested in poor performance and low academic achievement in mathematics and science for the vast majority of America's students, generally compared with students in other Western and industrialized Asian countries (Schmidt, 1998; Hoff, 2000; Eisenkraft, 2001; Peak, 1996; TIMSS Policy Forum, 1997; Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, 1997; Schmidt & Valverde, 1997; Schmidt, McNight, & Raizen, 1996). Mathematics and science education are seen as cornerstones of adequate functioning in a technological society. The lack of rigorous thinking and problem solving skills in students, particularly with reference to the content of instruction, is a frequently identified concern (Kinard & Falik, 1999). Simply learning calculations and mechanical processes, without understanding and manipulating the deeper structures of thinking, is clearly not sufficient for competence.

Pointing out what appears to be a lack of focus on rigorous thinking during mathematics instruction for young children, Bybee and Sund (1982, p. 255) state that teachers "have children adding and substracting before they even know the meaning of number." In a paper given at the 89th Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), Ball (2002) emphasizes the need for student engagement in rigorous mathematics concept development beginning at an early age. Ball also expresses the urgency for quality teacher professional development that will facilitate the nurturing of students through a rigorous mathematics-learning environment.

The need for rigorous thinking is clearly revealed in a study by Stigler and Hiebert (1997a, 1997b) of eighth-grade mathematics lessons in Germany, Japan, and the United States as part of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). TIMSS data show that U.S. eighth grade students scored below their peers from 27 nations in mathematics and below their peers from 16 nations in science (Peak, 1996; TIMSS Policy Forum, 1997; Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Rigorous Mathematical Thinking: Mediated Learning and Psychological Tools
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?