Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

'Never Again': Bosnia and Conventional Arms Restraints

By: Zucker, G. Samuel | Contemporary Review, February 1994 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

'Never Again': Bosnia and Conventional Arms Restraints


Zucker, G. Samuel, Contemporary Review


THE fiftieth anniversary of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising has been honoured by our saying, still again, 'Never Again'. Then we witness the slaughter in Bosnia and ask how we can make those words more than lessons from history. There have been three main responses to this question, none of which I believe is acceptable. All three responses call for us either to resign ourselves to inaction in Bosnia or to take action while denying, and hence endorsing, comparable atrocities. A fourth response is necessary, one that combines remedial and preventive action while not denying that any remedy is selective.

Among the responses of inaction, the first is isolationism: it simply ignores the question by invoking the need to address problems at home. The opposite response is moral intervention, to declare the tragedy of Bosnia a genocide, and as such, that the European Community and United States must try to stop it. This response correctly recognizes that isolationism is inhumane -- using geographic borders to excuse indifference to the murder of others. It also recognizes that isolationism has no limits: arbitrary borders can be extended infinitely. If Americans should not care about Bosnians because Bosnians are not Americans, then no one in New York should care about anyone in California, nor should Whites concern themselves with Blacks.

The third response is realism. It correctly points out the failure of moral interventionism, that it is 'selective prosecution' to invoke 'Never Again' for Bosnia and not for other areas of bloodshed. The nature of murder in Bosnia is not unique. 'Ethnic cleansing' drives most conflicts -- killing between different tribes, races, religions. Nor are numbers a guide. After 130,000 deaths in two years in former Yugoslavia, cries of 'Never Again' are hard to ignore, but the cries began at 15,000 deaths. The cries were heeded in Somalia after uncounted -- too many -- deaths. Yet no one cries 'Never Again' for the 15,000 killed in Huambo, …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?