A Mom and Pop Manifesto: What the Pro-Family Movement Wants from Congress

By Hyde, Henry J. | Policy Review, Spring 1994 | Go to article overview

A Mom and Pop Manifesto: What the Pro-Family Movement Wants from Congress


Hyde, Henry J., Policy Review


When Lenin, that architect of tyranny, asked his famous question--"What is to be done?"--his response was to overturn the foundations of civil society. Right question, wrong answer. America, now the free world's most violent nation, faces a historic moment of similar magnitude. What is to be done, by us, to restore the family as the surest basis of civil order, the strongest foundation for free enterprise, the safest home of freedom?

It is a question that official Washington seems incapable of answering. Instead of acknowledging the role of the traditional family in sustaining a democratic order, Congress continues at best to ignore, and at worst to undermine, that role in everything from education and health to aging and crime. In addition, Congress has placed new financial pressures on the family. Last year it repealed the Young Child Tax Credit, a Bush-era innovation to provide low-income households a refundable tax credit (about $500 per child) to help them care for newborns and toddlers. Meanwhile, President Clinton's tax hike--$255 billion over five years--will fall squarely on the American family, both in direct levies and higher prices.

ABDICATION, NOT ANALYSIS

It is now an oft-repeated truism that the problems of the family transcend public policy and that their solutions must therefore come primarily from outside government. That valid observation is easily distorted, however, into the specious assertion that there isn't much government can do to reverse the downward spiral of family life in this nation.

That is abdication, not analysis. The more we discover what government has done to undermine family life over the last three decades, the clearer it becomes that public policy must have a central role in restoring to America a family order of things.

Theologians tell us that prudence is one of the four cardinal virtues, the crucial good habits upon which all others depend. Much will depend upon the prudence of the pro-family movement in the months ahead. It would be short-sighted for the movement to allow its current mode of opposition, necessary as it is, to define its long-range future. Instead, a pro-family agenda must aim to reconstruct a now devastated mosaic of interrelationships, values, and assumptions. Rather than losing ourselves amid the many fragments, we can begin by setting in place the key pieces that give coherence to the whole picture.

RESTORE FAMILY PROSPERITY

The first piece is pro-family economic policy. That's not because money is the most important element in family life, but because government's appetite for the family's cash has been a crucial factor in creating its current plight. Most of us have heard the numbers. If today's personal exemption accounted for the same proportion of family income as it did in 1948, it would be about $8,000, not $2,350.

That means government has moved from sheltering families to crushing them. Despite all the talk about women having choices in our newly egalitarian work place, the ugly reality is that millions of American women have been "put to work." In Uncle Sam's new tax order, it's become the only way to maintain a decent lifestyle for their families.

Consider the cultural ripple effects of a dramatic increase in the personal exemption. For example, how many moderate-income families might, for the first time, be able to choose their children's schools? How many households would reconsider the necessity of having two earners? How many would pursue home schooling? How many parents, whether moms or dads, would find more time to spend with the kids and less to spend on the job?

To open up these opportunities, two House freshmen, Rod Grams and Tim Hutchinson, have introduced legislation to provide an across-the-board tax credit of $500 per child, to compensate in part for the erosion of the personal exemption. Their bill also would establish a commission, along the lines of Representative Dick Armey's successful Base-Closure Commission, to present Congress with a take-it-or-leave-it package of off-setting spending reductions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Mom and Pop Manifesto: What the Pro-Family Movement Wants from Congress
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.