Don't Let the Terabyte You: New E-Discovery Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

By Shelton, Gregory D. | Defense Counsel Journal, October 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Don't Let the Terabyte You: New E-Discovery Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure


Shelton, Gregory D., Defense Counsel Journal


A TERABYTE is unit of measurement for data storage capacity that is roughly equivalent to 50,000 trees made into paper and printed; (1) it is 500 million typewritten pages of plain text; (2) it is enough words that it would take every adult in America speaking at the same time five minutes to say them all, (3) and it is the amount of data that can be stored on only two to three commercially available hard disk drives, or on a single network server.

Electronic discovery is now a fact of life for companies, litigators and courts. The proliferation of computer usage, inexpensive data storage, and developments in communication technology have changed modern discovery practice tremendously over the past several years. Courts around the country have been promulgating ad hoc case law, rules, and procedures to deal with electronic discovery. (4) The United States Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure voiced concern about the effect this patchwork of rules will have on companies and individual litigants:

   Developing case law on discovery into
   electronically stored information under
   the current rules is not consistent and is
   necessarily limited to the specific facts
   involved. Disparate local rules have
   emerged to fill this gap between the
   existing discovery rules and practice,
   and more courts are considering local
   rules. Without national rules adequate to
   address the issues raised by electronic
   discovery, a patchwork of rules and
   requirements is likely to develop.
   While such inconsistencies are
   particularly confusing and debilitating
   to large public and private
   organizations, the uncertainty, expense,
   delays, and burdens of such discovery
   also affect small organizations and even
   individual litigants. (5)

To address the gap between the current Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and modern discovery practice, the Judicial Conference proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, 45, and Form 35. The United States Supreme Court approved the amendments and, absent unexpected congressional intervention, the changes will take effect on December 1, 2006. (6) Although the amendments are still a few months away, courts have already started looking to the proposed rules for guidance. (7)

Perhaps the most significant change effected by the new amendments will be the imposition of obligations on the parties to address issues relating to the discovery of electronic information very early in litigation. Meeting those obligations and the other requirements set forth in the new amendments will call for some new and creative approaches to discovery. Staying ahead of the terabytes of information that are accumulating in companies' computer systems and managing that information for discovery will require a great deal cooperation and communication between companies and their counsel. Indeed, there is already a growing expectation by the judiciary that counsel will be familiar with their client's electronic information systems.

Brief Summary of the Amendments

The proposed rules do not dramatically change e-discovery practices that have developed over the years in many jurisdictions. The proposed rules will specifically empower courts to adopt the parties' agreements regarding e-discovery into pretrial case management and scheduling orders. The new rules will allow a requesting party to test or sample electronically stored information and specify the format in which it wants electronic information produced. The rules also establish a two-tiered process for production whereby easily obtained information can be produced first, and less accessible data can be produced later, if necessary. The new rules envision a safe harbor from sanctions for the loss of electronically stored information, provided the loss is occasioned by the good-faith, routine operation of computer equipment.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Don't Let the Terabyte You: New E-Discovery Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?