A Brief History of Population Control and Contraception

By Bullough, Vern L.; Bullough, Bonnie | Free Inquiry, Spring 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

A Brief History of Population Control and Contraception


Bullough, Vern L., Bullough, Bonnie, Free Inquiry


Few, if any, individuals or societies have ever approached the maximum level of fertility, and the conclusion seems obvious that various customs and methods have been adopted to limit the number of births. Statisticians like to talk of a "total maternity ratio," which could be defined as the average number of previous live births per woman now aged forty-five or over, regardless of whether a particular woman has children (not all women can or do have children). This ratio varies with different groups and societies.

Note that the "total maternity ratio" is based upon live births, which means that abortions are excluded whether they are spontaneous or induced. Being born alive, however, does not mean that the infant survives to reach adulthood. Though infant mortality figures of the past are notoriously difficult to determine accurately, it is estimated that somewhere between 25 and 40 percent of the infants born alive prior to the nineteenth century did not live beyond their first birthday.(2)

Though infant mortality certainly cuts down population growth, it is not a form of birth control. Still, there is considerable evidence that the high mortality rate of newborns in many societies has not always been due to natural causes but has resulted from actions that would either consciously or unconsciously have led to a high death rate. Though few individuals and societies deliberately murder their infants (infanticide), various policies subtly (and some not so subtly) encourage it. A good example of this is the practice of wet nursing as it existed in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries in Paris and elsewhere. Infants who had survived the first three or four weeks (during which mortality is the highest) were removed from the mother and sent to the country to be fed by other women, who usually kept them for a year or more. Since wet nurses by definition usually had infants of their own to feed, and the parents of the boarded infant did not live close, the care varied tremendously and the mortality rate was very high, much higher than it would have been had the birth mother fed her own infant. One study estimated that of those infants sent out to wet nurses, some 25 percent had died by the end of the year. This would lead to a total mortality rate of over 40 percent.(3)

Perhaps the most obvious way to avoid either becoming pregnant or getting someone pregnant is to remain celibate. This in essence was the Christian remedy, and lifelong celibacy is still encouraged among such groups as Catholic priests and nuns. In the past, however, only a few societies have been either willing or able to impose long periods of celibacy upon more than a small minority of their members. Instead, most societies in the past were content to adopt short periods of continence by imposing prohibitions upon sexual intercourse during certain times of the year such as Lent, various feast days, or during certain periods of a woman's life (e.g., when she is lactating or menstruating). It is highly unlikely that such prohibitions originally were established as birth control measures, although they undoubtedly helped to cut down the pregnancy rate. The modern rhythm method is a deliberate effort to utilize periods of temporary continence to cut down the possibility of conception, but its effectiveness depends not only on understanding the menstrual cycle, something that we have only recently begun to do, but on the ability of any particular woman to determine when she ovulates, something that was impossible in the past and is still not easy.

Throughout history, people have also tried to utilize artificial means of preventing conception, although only a few have been particularly effective. Contemporary peoples who still live in tribal or nomadic groups, for example, are known to use douches and drugs, to practice withdrawal (coitus interruptus), and to insert tampons and pessaries, all to avoid pregnancy. Sub-incision is also practiced in some groups, and has a long history, although whether it was originally done for ritualistic reasons or contraceptive purposes is not now clear.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

A Brief History of Population Control and Contraception
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?