Quantifying the Threat to Archaeological Sites from the Erosion of Cultivated Soil

By Wilkinson, Keith; Tyler, Andrew et al. | Antiquity, September 2006 | Go to article overview

Quantifying the Threat to Archaeological Sites from the Erosion of Cultivated Soil


Wilkinson, Keith, Tyler, Andrew, Davidson, Donald, Grieve, Ian, Antiquity


Introduction

It has long been recognised that modern cultivation techniques, particularly ploughing, have an erosive impact on archaeological sites (e.g. Lambrick 1977). Nevertheless, it is only in recent years that any attempt has been made to quantify such erosion. According to the Monuments at Risk Survey for England (MARS), 'cultivation is the single biggest hazard facing monuments, accounting for 10 per cent of wholesale monument destruction and 30 per cent of piecemeal loss' (Darvill & Fulton 1998: 236-7). The effect of ploughing across an archaeological site is to reduce its surface expression, eventually removing all upstanding elements. Roman and prehistoric sites in particular are more likely to be known from cropmarks or soilmarks seen in aerial photographs, or as artefact scatters in the plough soil, rather than as upstanding monuments. In the 65[km.sup.2] area investigated by the Southern Quantock Archaeological Survey (SQAS, a collaboration between the Department of Archaeology, University of Winchester and Somerset County Council) in south-west England, for example, 80 per cent of archaeological sites recorded in the local Historic Environment Record (HER) (Somerset County Council 2005) are known from cropmarks only. Clearly, buried sites are of no lesser archaeological importance than upstanding monuments and their future survival is therefore an important consideration for local authority and national archaeological service archaeologists who have the responsibility for managing and conserving the archaeological resource (Somerset County Council and English Heritage respectively in the case of the SQAS study area). However, two factors have particularly hindered efforts to protect buried archaeological sites in England: firstly a legislative framework that is primarily designed to conserve upstanding monuments and secondly the difficulty in quantifying the risk to sub-surface archaeological features. Here we address the second by presenting the results of a pilot study which used soil [sup.137]Cs inventories to model soil redistribution over the last 40 years or so across four buried archaeological sites. At the end of the paper we return to the first question and discuss the implications of our work given forthcoming changes in both domestic and European Union (EU) policy on rural land management.

The Quantock Hills study area and its archaeology

The pilot study was carried out as part of SQAS between August 2002 and September 2004. SQAS itself comprises a five-year long programme of fieldwork and associated post-fieldwork analysis which seeks to investigate the pre-medieval archaeology of the southern slopes of the Quantock Hills. The Quantock Hills are a north-west to south-east trending range of hills in the county of Somerset (Figure 1). They are largely comprised of Devonian (slates and limestones) and Triassic (marl and sandstones) strata (Figure 1c), in which brown earth soils of the Milford, Whimple and Bromsgrove Series have been mapped (Findlay et al. 1984). The southern slopes have an average aspect of 7 per cent, but in practice the topography is highly variable. We measured [sup.137]Cs archives of soils at four sites with evidence for sub-surface archaeological features located on contrasting geological substrates and in varied slope positions. However, for reasons of space we only consider two in detail here (Stoneage Barton and Yarford) (Figure 1). As is the case with 80 of the 100 HER entries in the study area, the four sites were first recognised as cropmarks in aerial photographs taken in the mid 1970s--early 1990s (Wilkinson & Thorpe 1999).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Prior to 1999 there were only two sites of Roman date known from the study area and recorded in the HER, and it was therefore thought that the area had not been intensively occupied or exploited at this time. However, Roman settlement, ranging from simple farmsteads to a villa and dating from the second to fourth centuries AD, has been found on five of the six sites excavated by SQAS. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Quantifying the Threat to Archaeological Sites from the Erosion of Cultivated Soil
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.