New Scripture Document 'Thinking in Centuries.' (Pontifical Biblical Commission's "The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church")

By Hebblethwaite, Peter | National Catholic Reporter, March 25, 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

New Scripture Document 'Thinking in Centuries.' (Pontifical Biblical Commission's "The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church")

Hebblethwaite, Peter, National Catholic Reporter

OXFORD, England -- "The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church," prepared by Rome's Pontifical Biblical Commission, recently out in translation (Origins, Jan. 6), is the most important statement on this topic since Vatican II declared that "scripture is the soul of theology."

It contains some sensational material in its nuanced critique of feminist or liberationist interpretations of scripture. But they are the wrong place to start.

The document is first of all an extraordinary example of "thinking in centuries." The first pope to set down a marker on scripture was Leo XIII with his encyclical Providentissimus Deus, Nov. 18, 1893.

He was pretty negative about "modern" methods of exegesis, but that was understandable at a time when critical liberalism was rampant and was, it seemed, tearing the heart out of the gospels. Even so, he was much more open than his successor, St. Pius X, who set Catholic biblical studies back by at least two generations.

On the 50th anniversary of Leo's Providentissimus, Deus, Sept. 30, 1943, there appeared Pius XII's Divino Afflante Spiritus. Why was the pope fiddling while the world exploded and burned?

No doubt because he was "thinking in centuries." The effect of Divino Afflante Spiritu was to liberate Catholic exegetes from the most chafing anti-modernist shackles. It allowed, indeed encouraged, them to study the "literary forms" of the Bible.

That innocent phrase meant that to understand the Bible you did not have to interpret in the same way a narrative, a canticle, a psalm, a parable, a law text, a genealogy and so on. You had to respect the genre of each.

Then came Vatican II. Augustin Bea, the wily German Jesuit who had authored Pius' biblical encyclical and had also been his confessor, was made founding president of the Secretariat for Christian Unity by Pope John XXIII.

John also revamped the biblical commission when he thought they were behaving like dunces.

Today the commission is, according to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the commission's president, "not an organ of the teaching office but rather a commission of scholars who, in their scientific and ecclesial responsibility as believing exegetes, take stands on important problems of scriptural interpretation and know ... they have the confidence of the teaching office."

The 20 members, marshaled by their secretary Belgian Jesuit Albert Vanhoye, are all priests and consequently all male. There are five Jesuits -- including American Fr. Joseph Fitzmyer -- three Dominicans and one Oblate of Mary Immaculate. Serious scholars, they will probably never talk to Time and are unlikely to set the Tiber on fire either collectively or individually. But they are sound, essentially sound, incredibly sound. It is always important for theologians to know how far they can go: In biblical studies, this is how far you can go.

They submitted their document to Pope John Paul II in April 1993, in good time for the centenary of Leo's Providentissimus Deus. Maybe they saw their text as the draft for an encyclical.

Fortunately, John Paul had more pressing literary work in hand. He simply praised the document and ordered it to be published in November 1993 in French, its original language. But on reflection it could never have been an encyclical, for it mentions names and argues its case.

Is there such a thing as Catholic exegesis? The document answers firmly no, if by that is meant some special approach to scripture not shared by other Christians. Any "method" will do -- provided it throws light on the scripture. Methods have proliferated in the past 30 years: rhetorical analysis (scripture as persuasive religious discourse); narrative analysis (stories with a purpose -- salvation); structuralism (look at the text "in itself")" the text-in-its-effect-on-the-community.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

New Scripture Document 'Thinking in Centuries.' (Pontifical Biblical Commission's "The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church")


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?