Searches and Seizures of Americans Abroad: Re-Examining the Fourth Amendment's Warrant Clause and the Foreign Intelligence Exception Five Years after United States V. Bin Laden

By Then, Corey M. | Duke Law Journal, March 2006 | Go to article overview

Searches and Seizures of Americans Abroad: Re-Examining the Fourth Amendment's Warrant Clause and the Foreign Intelligence Exception Five Years after United States V. Bin Laden


Then, Corey M., Duke Law Journal


The proposition is, of course, not that the Constitution 'does not apply' overseas, but that there are provisions in the Constitution which do not necessarily apply in all circumstances in every foreign place.

--Justice John Harlan (1)

INTRODUCTION

The United States intelligence community subjects certain American citizens living abroad to secret wiretaps of their phones and physical searches of their homes, without obtaining a judicial warrant. Take for instance a Texan, living with his wife and young children in Kenya, whose every telephone conversation was monitored for a year and whose home was entered while he was away in order to confiscate his property. Should Americans care that their government might so intrude on their privacy without a warrant? Should those sentiments change when the Texan is an al-Qaeda operative who participated in the terrorist attacks on United States Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and who was later convicted of conspiracy to commit murder and destroy U.S. property?

Certainly, Americans should be concerned about their government's surveillance powers, especially during a war on terror that differs from any other conflict in our nation's history. Yet since a federal district judge decided five years ago in United States v. Bin Laden (2) that a judicial warrant is not required to search Americans abroad when the information sought is primarily for foreign intelligence rather than criminal investigative purposes, (3) the judiciary has been silent on this point. Because the constitutionality of these warrantless searches is by no means settled, the recent five-year anniversary of Bin Laden makes this a fitting time to re-examine the judicial approach to searches of Americans living abroad during the war on terror and to determine whether a different standard is needed.

This Note argues that warrants to conduct electronic surveillance and physical searches of Americans abroad are neither constitutionally required nor an effective safeguard of liberty. Whereas the majority of the scant commentary on Bin Laden has criticized it for asserting a foreign intelligence exception (4) to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement, (5) this Note attempts to shift the framework within which the Bin Laden court worked. Although Bin Laden's acceptance of the foreign intelligence exception correctly prevented the court from having to exclude valuable evidence that helped convict an international terrorist, future courts should not be confined by the warrant requirement and the exclusionary rule.

Instead, this Note proposes that the Constitution does not require a warrant for searches and seizures of Americans abroad, whether the searches are for foreign intelligence gathering or normal criminal investigations. This proposition may at first seem an anathema, but Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is riddled with exceptions to the warrant requirement that prove it is not absolute. (6) Although a warrant is constitutionally required in many domestic searches, that does not lead indubitably to the conclusion that a warrant is required for searches outside of the United States. The many exceptions in modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence suggest that courts have been heavily influenced by policy considerations in making their constitutional pronouncements regarding warrants. (7) Yet there is little in the text or history of the amendment that mandates a preference for warrants, and in the case of searches abroad, practical and policy considerations weigh against recognizing a warrant requirement. One of the central policy considerations behind recognizing a warrant requirement is to protect the privacy of American citizens against unreasonable searches, but this Note contends that, for searches occurring overseas, courts could ensure greater privacy protection by developing a more rigorous legal reasonableness standard (8) that opens the federal government up to greater civil liability. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Searches and Seizures of Americans Abroad: Re-Examining the Fourth Amendment's Warrant Clause and the Foreign Intelligence Exception Five Years after United States V. Bin Laden
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.