Our Video Culture

By Alton, David | Contemporary Review, April 1994 | Go to article overview

Our Video Culture


Alton, David, Contemporary Review


Editor's Note: The horrific murder of a two-year-old boy, James Bulger, by two boys in Liverpool has led to considerable debate, especially after their conviction at the end of last year, about the growth of violence in British society and particularly the effect of |video nasties' on young people. David Alton, Liberal Democrat MP for Liverpool, Mossley Hill, has been leading a campaign to restrict the distribution of horror videos among children.

IN the aftermath of the James Bulger verdicts, Dr. Susan Bailey, Britain's only forensic psychiatrist for adolescents, confirmed that in one study of 40 murderers aged between five and 18, a quarter were found to have been influenced by violence and pornograpby on the screen. Meanwhile, the Home Secretary, Michael Howard, and his advisers were sticking to their hackneyed line that there is no proven correlation between real-life violence and that which is broadcast.

Earlier in the year I tabled a Commons Motion -- backed by more than 100 MPs -- calling for action against video and television violence. During Prime Minister's Question Time on the day before the Bulger verdicts, I had urged John Major to tackle television violence and the easy availability of brutal and horrific videos. I told him that an American pre-school child will have seen an average of 20,000 murders, broadcast on television, by the age of five and that the same culture of violence is being created in the United Kingdom. In the aftermath of the verdicts, and supported by MPs from all parties, I tabled a Commons Motion, supported by 40 MPs, drawing attention to the work of Elliot Aranson who, in The Social Animal, convincingly argues that children copy the aggressive behaviour of adults. My motion also calls for gratuitously violent material to be banned.

The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology says that there are video recorders in 68 per cent of British homes and that |material classified as "15" or "18" is routinely seen by younger audiences, whether due to failures at the retail outlet, lack of parental control, or evasion of rules' (for example, by televisions in younger people's bedrooms). The office goes on to say that 'studies show that the threshold of tolerated violence is raised in groups who have watched violent films'. The Royal College of Psychiatrists has also pointed to media violence as one area where tighter controls could help protect vulnerable children.

Videos which contain graphic and highly explicit scenes of violence are easily available. I strongly believe that this helps to explain why the level of violence today is higher than it was 15 years ago. Our tolerant society should not confuse the need to protect the vulnerable, such as easily impressionable children, with censorship.

Many families living in Liverpool -- and the same picture must be true everywhere else -- regularly hire videos. There is nothing wrong with that. Parents who are discerning in what they choose can ensure that the only material shown to their children is innocent and even educational. The Prime Minister, in his reply to me, said that responsible parents could and should vet what their children see. That is all right as far as it goes.

But what about parents who simply dump their children in front of a video; who allow the video to become a surrogate parent and a substitute for conversation? Or the parent who brings hundreds of videos into his home, which include material containing gratuitous violence or soft porn? He might say that his child would not be allowed to watch it, and is sent to bed. But that probably only increases the desire of the child to see the material -- and the parent will not know if the child watches it during his absence.

A video called Child's Play 3 is just such an example. Would you want a video lying around in your home which shows a doll coming to life as a child, to be attacked and mutilated, with its head broken, splattered with blue paint, and its battered, dead body left discarded?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Our Video Culture
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.