Justice Affirmed

By Andelman, David A. | Management Review, June 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Justice Affirmed

Andelman, David A., Management Review

Aquiet revolution is taking place in the large, nondescript granite block of a building at the corner of Third and Constitution in Washington D.C. In this building, the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, Judge John Sirica held court over the Watergate conspirators a quarter century ago. This spring, 11 top officials of the Clinton Administration came here to testify before a federal grand jury investigating the Whitewater affair.

But today, 333 Constitution Avenue is also the symbol of a more fundamental change--the deepest and most revolutionary in a generation in the entire federal judicial system. President Bill Clinton is putting his imprimatur on federal courthouses across the nation. It may be his ultimate legacy with implications for businesses of every conceivable size, in every industry. Long after Whitewater fades into history, long after the debates over NAFTA, GATT and health-care have become distant echoes, the men and women chosen as federal judges during this Administration will still be dispensing justice.

The importance of the federal judiciary to businesses continues to grow every year. Each session of Congress removes more items from state and local jurisdiction and turns them over to the federal court system including product and shareholder liability statutes, and privacy laws at home and in the workplace. Moreover, an admittedly activist Justice Department under Janet Reno has committed itself to a more aggressive stance toward violations in a range of areas from environmental enforcement to civil rights in the workplace, anti-trust issues and white-collar crime. "There will be more litigation," says Eleanor Dean Acheson, assistant attorney general for policy development. "Society is changing, business is going off in new directions. There will be a lot of discussion and application of civil rights laws, and the Justice Department will be at least, if not more, activist. The same is true in the civil division, and the anti-trust division."

The importance of the role played by political inclination in the federal judiciary is delineated by Robert A. Carp, who published a landmark study in the journal of the American Judicature Society, a legal research group. Carp examined federal trialcourt and appellate decisions, back to 1933. In the areas of labor and economic regulation, Carp discovered that judges appointed during the Bush Administration ruled against business 48 percent of the time, versus 47 percent by Reagan-appointed judges and 61 percent for those appointed by Jimmy Carter. During the four years of his Administration, George Bush appointed 148 federal district court judges out of the 846 in the federal Office of the Administration of the United States Courts.

Yet when Bill Clinton arrived in the White House, he found 100 vacancies, a figure that quickly rose to 130. Filling these openings not surprisingly has touched off some of the most impassioned rhetoric and powerful soul-searching among conservatives and liberals, Republicans and Democrats alike.

Acheson is the keeper of the flame for the Clinton judiciary. Her office processes and interviews every judicial applicant and passes on every appointee. Her resume would appear to guarantee that only the most impeccable of white-shoe, Eastern establishment nominees would find their way to the federal bench: Granddaughter of Dean Acheson, Secretary of State for Harry Truman, and daughter of United States Attorney David Acheson. Eleanor Acheson herself spent 19 years in the patrician Boston firm of Ropes & Gray, leaving her partnership only to accept this appointment to public office.

We the People

Yet Eldie, as those who work with her call her affectionately, talks a very different story. Her aim is to return the federal judiciary, especially at its most basic trial level--the district courts-- to the people: "This is where most people have their first and often only experience with the federal courts," says Acheson.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Justice Affirmed


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?