Attorney's Fees in Civil Litigation: Controlling the Costs

By McCormack, William U. | The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, April 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Attorney's Fees in Civil Litigation: Controlling the Costs

McCormack, William U., The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin

One of the most significant aspects of many civil suits filed against law enforcement defendants for alleged violations of constitutional rights(1) is the associated attorney's fees in the case. Often, the prospect of incurring high attorney's fees determines whether a law enforcement officer or a government entity vigorously defends a civil suit by asserting all possible defenses and immunities or instead settles the suit. This article examines recent developments concerning the important issue of attorney's fees in civil litigation and suggests strategies for law enforcement defendants to better control potential civil liability.

Methods of Compensation

To understand the impact of attorney's fees on civil liability, it is first necessary to understand the ways in which an attorney receives compensation for representing a plaintiff and whether the plaintiff is reimbursed for those fees. In a common law tort suit, such as a car accident, in which the claim is negligence, courts follow the so-called "American Rule," where each side bears the costs for its own attorney's fees.(2) Thus, if the plaintiff prevails, the plaintiff is not reimbursed by the defendant for the plaintiff's attorney fees, which are typically calculated on either an hourly rate or a contingency fee basis. With a contingency fee, the plaintiff's attorney takes a certain percentage of the damage award, usually 30 to 50 percent, but receives no monetary compensation if the plaintiff loses.

After concluding the "American Rule" insufficiently encouraged civil suits alleging constitutional violations, Congress enacted the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 1988.(3) This act authorizes Federal district courts to award reasonable attorney's fees to prevailing parties in civil rights litigation brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983.(4)

Under 1988, a person who sues under 1983 and prevails in the lawsuit is entitled not only to damages but also to an award for attorney's fees.(5) These fees are typically calculated by multiplying the reasonable number of hours the attorney expended by a reasonable hourly rate.(6) Thus, the attorney's fees that law enforcement defendants may have to pay to the plaintiff continually increase as a 1983 lawsuit progresses through the normal stages of pretrial motions, discovery, trial, and appeals.

This threat of an ever-escalating award of attorney's fees presumably causes many law enforcement defendants to settle suits before trial, even when the validity of the suit is questionable because of viable defenses or immunities. The concern over the cost to a law enforcement defendant or agency for attorney's fees is further heightened by the need to pay the lawyers who are defending the suit. As a result, it is not uncommon for the attorney's fees to be the most significant monetary aspect in civil litigation. In many instances, the attorney's fees of the plaintiff awarded under 1988 exceed the damages awarded to the plaintiff.(7)

Settlement Considerations

Quickly settling a lawsuit that a plaintiff is likely to win can be an extremely advantageous tactic for a law enforcement defendant. By using Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) to settle a case, a law enforcement defendant may limit attorney's fees and other costs of litigation, such as expert witness fees.

Rule 68 provides that a defendant in a lawsuit may offer to allow judgment to be taken against him or her "with costs then accrued." If the offer of judgment is rejected by the plaintiff and the judgment finally obtained by the plaintiff is less favorable than the offer, the plaintiff "must pay the costs incurred after the making of the offer."

In Marek v. Chesney,(8) the Supreme Court determined that Rule 68 "costs" include 1988 attorney's fees. Marek is a good example of how a quick Rule 68 offer of judgment can limit attorney's fees and costs.

In Marek, three police officers, in answering a domestic disturbance call, shot and killed the plaintiff's son.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Attorney's Fees in Civil Litigation: Controlling the Costs


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?