Is Ecumenical Apologetics Sufficient? A Response to Lesslie Newbigin's " Ecumenical Amnesia." (Response to Lesslie Newbigin, International Bulletin, Jan. 1994)

By Kaiser, Konrad | International Bulletin of Missionary Research, April 1994 | Go to article overview

Is Ecumenical Apologetics Sufficient? A Response to Lesslie Newbigin's " Ecumenical Amnesia." (Response to Lesslie Newbigin, International Bulletin, Jan. 1994)


Kaiser, Konrad, International Bulletin of Missionary Research


Under the title "Ecumenical Amnesia," this Bulletin published in its January 1994 issue a review by Bishop Lesslie Newbigin of my book Ecumenism in Transition (Geneva, 1991). I am grateful to the editor, Dr. Gerald Anderson, for having invited me to contribute a response to this review for the subsequent issue. Since I wrote my book in order to generate discussion about the present condition of the ecumenical movement, this is a very welcome opportunity to engage in critical dialogue.

My gratitude is further directed to Lesslie Newbigin, whom I deeply respect as a trusted guide on the ecumenical way. Of the various critical reviews of my book, his is by far the fairest and most noble one, and he enters into the heart of the argument. Indeed, it is this kind of mutual challenging and mutual correction rooted in a common commitment that we need in the ecumenical movement; it is a central expression of what this movement is all about.

In saying this, I am gladly affirming one of the main concerns of Lesslie Newbigin. He may have read my book as advocating "the relativism of postmodern culture" and as suggesting an easy form of ecumenical coexistence that "evades the pain of mutual criticism and mutual correction." I do not recognize my intentions in this interpretation and would affirm as strongly as he does that "the WCC must see itself as the meeting place for all who make a Christological and Trinitarian affirmation along the lines of the WCC Basis. However sharp the disagreements are, the WCC cannot accept a less demanding role."

I also acknowledge gratefully that Lesslie Newbigin confirms at least the first part of my thesis by admitting that the concept of "Christo-centric universalism" is indeed a true description of the dominant model in the formative days of the WCC." He further repeats his earlier, conviction that a "full Trinitarian theology" is needed - at least for an adequate missiology. I shall come back to this point at the end of my response. Finally, I am in agreement with him - and have said so in my book - that the Trinitarian perspective cannot be placed as an "alternative" over against the Christological confession but must be understood as its proper biblical frame of interpretation.

However, we seem to disagree about what it means to take the Trinitarian faith seriously and specifically to appreciate the constitutive role of the Holy Spirit in understanding the Christ event. Newbigin does not really respond to this challenge, which is central to my argument, and in fact he can state his basic Christological and ecclesiological affirmations almost without any reference to the pneumatological dimension.

I think it would not be unfair to say that Newbigin wants to maintain "Christo-centric universalism" as the valid model for understanding the ecumenical movement and would therefore reject my analysis of an emerging "paradigm shift." His entire critical reflection is based on the conviction of the nonnegotiable truth of the earlier paradigm, and he would consider any departure from it dangerous for the ecumenical movement.

I have no difficulty accepting his review as a very sincere effort to defend the continuing validity of the basic elements of the old paradigm - in particular its understanding of unity, its Christology with a strong emphasis on the atonement, its ecclesiology, and its missionary orientation. This is an expression of the theology and piety of the tradition of evangelical Protestantism out of which I come myself. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Is Ecumenical Apologetics Sufficient? A Response to Lesslie Newbigin's " Ecumenical Amnesia." (Response to Lesslie Newbigin, International Bulletin, Jan. 1994)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.