Towards an Asia-Pacific Community: Michael Powles Discusses Current Trends in Asia-Pacific Economic Integration and the Evolving Concept of 'Asia'

By Powles, Michael | New Zealand International Review, November-December 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Towards an Asia-Pacific Community: Michael Powles Discusses Current Trends in Asia-Pacific Economic Integration and the Evolving Concept of 'Asia'


Powles, Michael, New Zealand International Review


There are so many regional economic or political arrangements, in place or proposed, in the Asia-Pacific region that they have been described as a regional noodle bowl. But despite some movement towards regional economic integration, that goal has not yet been achieved, and it may still be some distance away. There can be no enduring regional economic integration unless it and the vehicle, or architecture, devised to bring it about are built on a solid political foundation. The construction of this essential political foundation is today only in its early stages and is proceeding slowly. Hardly anything is clear or decided, not even what constitutes 'Asia' for this purpose.

The idea of a possible Asia or Asia-Pacific community, incorporating full or partial economic integration, is not at all new. The objective of region-wide trade liberalisation was behind the formation of the Asia Pacific Economic (APEC) forum in the early 1990s. And the idea was clearly articulated in 2001 by an East Asian Vision Group led by former South Korean President Kim Dae Jung. (1) For many years, of course, Asian leaders have been conscious of the significant movement towards economic integration in the European region. But they will also have been conscious that, whereas there has been full reconciliation in Europe among the Second World War belligerents, the equivalent process has been much slower in Asia and, in some respects, can be said not to be complete yet.

Today, however, there is renewed talk of a possible East Asian community, thought by many to be an essential first step on any road towards economic integration. What will be needed, of course, is the political will to strike the deals and make the necessary concessions from which new regional arrangements can emerge. It is far from clear today whether political relationships in the region are yet such that this can happen. Indeed, while the leaders of East Asia's two major powers, China and Japan, are unable even to hold a bilateral meeting, it is most unlikely that there could be significant progress towards economic integration.

Politicians and diplomats, and even economists, tend, however, to be optimists. Many believe that the time is coming when the regional political will will exist in the region. For this reason, there is already much discussion of how economic integration could be brought about, what the process might be or, as some say, what the necessary regional architecture might look like. These things inevitably take much negotiation and time. There is logic in trying to move ahead now so that when the political foundation in the form of the necessary political will catches up, progress ahead could be rapid and it would be unnecessary to start from scratch.

Best vehicle

What seems then to be the best vehicle or the most promising institution to achieve Asia-Pacific economic integration? There are a number of candidates among existing and currently proposed regional organisations and forums. Some of the better known and indeed successful ones can be put to one side as not being appropriate.

First there is the Association of South East Asian Nations, which now has ten members, all geographically South-east Asian countries. It is not region-wide and therefore, while it has become one of the most influential organisations in the Asia-Pacific region, it cannot itself provide the architecture for region-wide economic integration. It is likely, though, to continue to be in the 'driver's seat' of moves towards closer Asia and Asia-Pacific region-wide co-operation and integration for the practical political reason that the alternative of having one of the major political powers of the region in the driving seat would almost certainly be unacceptable to other major political powers. (2)

Then there is the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation (SCO), with a membership comprising China, Russia, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan, and several observers clearly anxious to join, including Pakistan and Iran.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Towards an Asia-Pacific Community: Michael Powles Discusses Current Trends in Asia-Pacific Economic Integration and the Evolving Concept of 'Asia'
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?