The U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement: Impact on the U.S. Steel Industry

By Williams, Harold R.; Botzman, Thomas J. | American Economist, Spring 1994 | Go to article overview

The U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement: Impact on the U.S. Steel Industry


Williams, Harold R., Botzman, Thomas J., American Economist


Introduction

The United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement (FTA) provides the basis for a significant expansion of U.S.-Canadian trade. Both countries should gain at the macro level of economic activity. However, specific industries within each nation will be affected differently. Some will gain directly and indirectly from the new opportunities created by trade diversion, trade creation, and the long run competitive forces set into motion by the trade liberalization program. Others will be hurt and gradually lose their protection-created competitive advantage. The U.S. steel industry is one of the industries most likely to be heavily affected by the trade liberalization forces set into motion by the FTA.

This paper estimates disaggregated price and income elasticities for U.S.-Canadian steel exports and imports which are then used to determine how changes brought about by the FTA will affect the U. S. steel industry. The Agreement, which took effect January 1, 1989, provides for phasing out most tariff barriers between the U. S. and Canada over the next ten years. About 70 percent of U.S.-Canada bilateral trade has been free of trade impediments for many years. Restrictions against the remaining 30 percent are being removed in three steps--immediately, over 5 years, or over 10 years. Carbon steel products are in the 10-year phase-out group. Hence, the empirical impact of the trade liberalization program on steel imports and exports will be minimal for several years.

The U.S. steel industry was selected for detailed study because it is a major basic industry that faces intensive international competition. Moreover, it accounts directly and indirectly for a significant part of U.S. GNP and employment. The U.S. steel industry is composed of three types of producers: integrated manufacturers, minimills, and alloy steel manufacturers. The integrated manufacturers, the core of the industry, have seen their worldwide leadership fall during recent decades. Many of the integrated firms have closed, merged, or dramatically cut back production and employment. The newer minimills are much smaller operations than the integrated mills and concentrate on lower end steel products--bars and structural shapes--manufactured from scrap. Alloy steel production is the smallest of the three steel market segments. These producers concentrate on making high value-added specialty steel products.

Foreign competition, coupled with dramatic gains by the minimills, has radically changed the face of the U.S. steel industry over the past decade. Since the late 60s the integrated U.S. manufacturers have successfully led the drive for import protection. In recent years the minimills have joined them in the call for government assistance. In response, two major U. S. programs were implemented to shield domestic producers from the outside competitors, the 1978-1981 Trigger Price Mechanism (TPM)(1) and the Voluntary Restraint Agreement (VRA)(2) program of 1985 to 1992. These programs slowed the growth rate for steel imports but did not stop foreign competitors from supplying a larger volume of steel to the domestic market, particularly in higher value-added steel products. Imports of steel mill products rose from 17.5 million tons in 1979 to nearly 21 million net tons in 1988 [American Iron and Steel Institute]. The FTA presents a unique opportunity for restructuring and rationalization of the North American steel industry according to the principles of free trade. Several studies predict gains from free trade for the aggregated industry [for example, Cox and Harris; Crandall]. However, the steel industry's products employ distinct production methods and thus require examination of industry prospects at the product level. Previous academic studies do not quantitatively assess the impact of free trade on industry segments.

Most of the econometric modeling of the Agreement has been done by Canadian researchers and concentrates largely on determining how the FTA will affect Canada. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement: Impact on the U.S. Steel Industry
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.