Economic Interests and Strategic Rivalries in Asia-Pacific: Montreal, October 3, 2006

By Mistral, Jacques | Behind the Headlines, Autumn 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Economic Interests and Strategic Rivalries in Asia-Pacific: Montreal, October 3, 2006

Mistral, Jacques, Behind the Headlines

The Pacific Basin is today the engine of world growth, as the transatlantic relationship had been in the post-WWII world economy. Increasing economic ties are a common feature of both periods but there is a striking difference. The former was based on European integration and on a solid geopolitical alliance; the latter has a weak institutional framework with no geopolitical ground. The Pacific basin, exploding as the new driver of world growth, is frequently said to open an age of unprecedented "globalization", by which we mean that the new driver plays primarily by a set of rules based on pure economic interests. Too little attention has been paid in this context to the weak geopolitical basis of support for this phase of globalization. Existing rules are beginning to show signs of stress as the Pacific region pays closer and closer attention to a changing strategic environment. It is this intersection of strategic and economic considerations that I would like to explore.

After the end of the cold war, security questions were supposed to be relegated to the back burner. Economics had become the main driver on the world stage. Since then many threats might have been expected to weaken the basis of prosperity; 9/11, terrorism and security measures, inflation fuelled by oil market disruptions, chaos in Iraq, nationalism in Russia, Castrism in Venezuela and most importantly the mounting crises with North Korea and Iran.

All this certainly creates a sense of economic and financial nervousness. Yet, the really impressive fact is that, entering the 21st century, the world economy has proven so incredibly resilient.

The economic secret of our age lies in the Pacific basin. The corollary is that China's increasing wealth and influence irresistibly transform the previous geopolitical paradigm. From now on, China's economic strength cannot be ignored in geopolitical terms.

In Washington, China looks more and more to be a potential rival whose economic strength is seen most importantly as a basis for increased geopolitical weight. Space ambitions, military modernization, amphibious manoeuvres with Russia increasingly attract attention to strategic considerations.

On its side, China clearly emphasizes non-military aspects of its comprehensive national power, deploying new initiatives in terms of soft power, defined by Joseph Nye as "the ability to reach its goal by attraction rather than by coercion". China is setting aside areas of disagreement with neighbouring states, promoting ties through confidence-building initiatives, addressing common concerns through multilateral cooperation. China's regional influence is quickly growing all the more due to the weakness of regional institutions like Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation.

China denies any ambition to become a regional leader but suspicions remain in the US about its real intentions. China has been instrumental in the creation of multilateral vehicles of regional co-operation that do not involve the US, as in December 2005 when East Asia created a new regional forum where America for the first time had not been invited and that has been perceived as an attempt to undermine US influence in the region.

Maintaining the existing framework, which served the region so well in the past decades would certainly be the preferred solution for Asia-Pacific nations. China itself clearly places enormous value on maintaining a positive relationship with the US. But the status quo in the Pacific Basin is not an option. Rising China makes other Asian nations uncomfortable. Everyone has decided to buy into the Chinese economic success, but no one would like it to fuel a more assertive diplomatic and strategic posture. America's intentions are also ambiguous. Following President Bush's visit to Beijing in November 2005, "China, engagement or containment?" remains an intensely debated question in Washington. The ambiguity of the relationship between China and the US is nowhere more visible than about Taiwan.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Economic Interests and Strategic Rivalries in Asia-Pacific: Montreal, October 3, 2006


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?