Evaluating a Metacognitive and Planned Happenstance Career Training Course for Taiwanese College Students

By Chien, Ju-Chun; Fischer, Jerome M. et al. | Journal of Employment Counseling, December 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Evaluating a Metacognitive and Planned Happenstance Career Training Course for Taiwanese College Students

Chien, Ju-Chun, Fischer, Jerome M., Biller, Ernest, Journal of Employment Counseling

This study used a pretest-posttest, nonequivalent control group, quasi-experimental design to examine the effectiveness of a 12-week, metacognitive and planned happenstance career training course for Taiwanese college students. The treatment groups significantly increased their career competencies in metacognitive, cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions over the comparison and nonequivalent control groups.


Because of technological advances, people are now progressing from the late industrial era to a new informational era (Stage & Dean, 2000). Although high technology makes lives more convenient than ever before, living in the information age inevitably brings turbulence and uncertainty. To help individuals form better career paths and lead meaningful lives in the 21st century, career practitioners and theorists are developing and refining effective career-related interventions to improve people's career decision-making competencies (Griffin & Hesketh, 2003; Spokane, Fouad, & Swanson, 2003).

Research has clearly demonstrated positive outcomes for career interventions (Thomas & McDaniel, 2004; Tinsley, Tinsley, & Rushing, 2002; Vernick, Reardon, & Sampson, 2004; Wessel, Christian, & Hoff, 2003; Whiston, Brecheisen, & Stephens, 2003). Career-related interventions have become increasingly common and successful. On the other hand, some career researchers and/or practitioners have proposed that career decision making and development might not be linear and further postulated the importance of investigating the impact of chance events on an individual's career path (Betsworth & Hanson, 1996; Cabral & Salomone, 1990; Krumbohz & Levin, 2004; Magnuson, Wilcoxon, & Norem, 2003; Mitchell, Levin, & Krumboltz, 1999; Pelsma & Arnett, 2002; Pryor & Bright, 2003; Scott & Hatalla, 1990; E. N. Williams et al., 1998). However, an examination of the literature on the impact of chance events demonstrates that many career-related interventions do not seem to rise above the conceptual level. Few articles have investigated implementing planned chance as a factor in career development (Betsworth & Hanson, 1996; Hart, Rayner, & Christensen, 1971; Scott & Hatalla, 1990; E. N. Williams et al., 1998). Furthermore, none of these researchers evaluated how to optimize the benefit of using chance events to enhance people's career capabilities in a career development training course.


Nevertheless, in their planned happenstance theory, Mitchell et al. (1999) proposed that because of the rapid shifts in the world of work, chance events should no longer be ignored in the process of career counseling; on the contrary, both clients and career counselors should regard the chance factor as inevitable and desirable. More important, Mitchell et al. highlighted the need to help clients capitalize on chance events to broaden their career potential. The purpose of planned happenstance theory was to "assist clients to generate, recognize, and incorporate chance events into their career development" (Mitchell et al., 1999, p. 117). Specifically, this theory initially emphasized the importance of understanding an individual's personal experiences. In addition, it detailed ways for the individual to frame events as meaningful learning opportunities, engage in self-encouragement, use cognitive restructuring, and capitalize on positive chance events. In this manner, people could broaden their visions and take positive actions toward an unforeseen future. This might prepare them to overcome career obstacles and attain their desired career goals. In other words, in comparison with other chance approaches, the planned happenstance theory not only takes into account the chance factor in career development but also provides a series of guidelines for clients to use in taking constructive action and creating opportunities for achieving personal goals.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Evaluating a Metacognitive and Planned Happenstance Career Training Course for Taiwanese College Students


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?