Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Is Corrections Ready for TQM?

By: Simonsen, Clifford E.; Arnold, Douglas G. | Corrections Today, July 1994 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Is Corrections Ready for TQM?


Simonsen, Clifford E., Arnold, Douglas G., Corrections Today


American business is undergoing a revolution in management. This new method of leadership has a number of different names: Total Quality Management (TQM), Total Quality Improvement, World$Class Quality and several other titles centered around the word "quality."

TQM is probably the most recognizable of these latest buzzwords and seems to be the most widely used by seminar salespeople and management writers. The basic concepts of TQM have been derived from the work of W. Edwards Deming, the management guru credited with bringing about the recovery and ascendancy of Japanese business in the last half century.

Can Deming's famous "14 Points" be applied to criminal justice operations, and in particular to corrections? This article discusses the need for quality management in corrections and the aspects of TQM that are applicable to our field.

The Public's Call For Quality and Value

TQM may not have the same immediate appeal to correctional administrators as Management by Objectives, Management by Results and many other techniques that have been touted in the past. But while these programs promised quick results, they had dismal records and generally failed because they used quotas or numerical objectives dictated from the top and involved only management-derived measures of success. Such techniques were geared toward creating quick, short-term results by simply doing more of the same, or the same faster. Because "the same" did not meet management's goals in the first place, more of it didn't bring about improvement.

A classic example from the private sector is the apathy American automobile manufacturers showed toward the fact that their cars did not meet the needs and desires of American consumers. Rather than improving the quality and value of American automobiles, they increased production of low-quality cars that guzzled gas and didn't last. It was only when Japanese car manufacturers, using TQM concepts, began to cost them billions of dollars in unsold cars, recalls, rebates and other failed efforts that the total quality movement finally began to be explored and adopted. American car makers now seem to have gotten the point and are slowly winning back customers by offering higher quality and value.

In corrections, we have seen various reports and studies in recent decades that have called for improved quality and productivity. These studies, while having merit, did not foresee the crowding and violence in today's prisons. Rising crime rates in America put us as correctional managers in a tough situation. If we cannot improve quality and productivity, we lose support for our …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?