Taxes, Transfers, and Voter Behavior in U.S. Midterm Elections

By Akarca, Ali T.; Andrianacos, Dimitri | International Advances in Economic Research, November 2006 | Go to article overview

Taxes, Transfers, and Voter Behavior in U.S. Midterm Elections


Akarca, Ali T., Andrianacos, Dimitri, International Advances in Economic Research


Abstract

The effects of changes in per capita real GDP, real taxes and real government transfer payments on midterm congressional election outcomes during the 1946-2002 period are examined. Voters are found to take all of these, except taxes and transfers at the state and local government levels, into account in casting their ballots. However, the weights they place on each are found not to be the same. Consequently, the common practice of summarizing the economic conditions faced by voters through disposable income seems to be inappropriate. Also, omission of tax and transfer variables from the vote equation, and using vote swing rather than vote share as the dependent variable is found to result in underestimation of the coefficient of per capita GDP growth. (JEL D70).

Keywords: congressional elections, economic voting, taxes, government transfers

Introduction

Whether economic conditions affect the US midterm congressional election outcomes is a highly controversial issue. Conclusions in this regard vary from study to study and depend on the way the vote equation is specified, in particular, how its dependent variable is defined. Tufte [1975] in his seminal study used, as the dependent variable, the standardized vote share of the incumbent party, defined as the deviation of the presidential party's vote share from the average of previous eight House elections. Regressing this variable on the growth rate of per capita real disposable income and the presidential approval rate, using data covering the 1938-1970 period (excluding 1942), he found both of these independent variables to be important determinants of midterm election outcomes. Later Tufte [1978] reached the same conclusion, analyzing the 1946-1974 period and getting substantially larger parameter estimates for his two explanatory variables. For many studies that followed Tufte [1975, 1978], his specification became the norm. It was adopted with only minor modifications. Hibbs [1982], for example, dropped the presidential popularity from the equation and used geometrically weighted average income to represent economic conditions in examining the 1946-1978 period, while keeping Tufte's standardized vote share variable as the left-hand side variable. He too found income to be an important factor in explaining midterm election results.

Erikson [1990], however, challenged the Tufte specification. He pointed out that using Tufte's standardized vote as the dependent variable in a regression is equivalent to running it with the presidential party's vote as the dependent variable, and adding eight lagged values of this variable on the right-hand side of the equation, but with the coefficients of the latter restricted to be 1/8. He argued in favor of lifting these implied restrictions and letting the values of these coefficients to be determined empirically. When he did that, using the data for the 1946-1986 period, the parameters of all lagged vote share variables, except the one for the previous election, turned out to be insignificant. Furthermore, with only one lagged dependent variable in the equation, the coefficients of per capita real disposable income growth and the presidential approval rating were not significantly different from zero. Thus, he concluded that, while the political inertia (or voting history as he referred to it) exerts a strong effect on midterm election outcomes, the effects of economic performance and presidential coattails do not matter. However, according to Erikson's results, the coefficient of the lagged vote term was not significantly different than unity. Consequently, Jacobson [1990] argued that one can assume it to be one. Then the lagged vote term can be moved to the left-hand side, making the dependent variable the vote swing (change from the previous vote). Regressing this dependent variable on the two variables in question produced statistically significant coefficients.

Alesina et al. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Taxes, Transfers, and Voter Behavior in U.S. Midterm Elections
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.