Scamper for Rule Changes; Focus It Is the Largest Piece of Legislation in British History and Is Set to Fundamentally Change the Way That Companies Operate. Ian McDonald of Newcastle Law Firm Ward Hadaway Looks at the Implications of the Companies Act 2006

The Journal (Newcastle, England), January 3, 2007 | Go to article overview

Scamper for Rule Changes; Focus It Is the Largest Piece of Legislation in British History and Is Set to Fundamentally Change the Way That Companies Operate. Ian McDonald of Newcastle Law Firm Ward Hadaway Looks at the Implications of the Companies Act 2006


Byline: Ian McDonald

SCAMPI is an unlikely source of controversy, but the humble shellfish sparked high-level parliamentary debate late last year.

The row centred on plans by sea food company Young's to send scampi and other shellfish caught in Scottish waters on a 12,000-mile round trip to be processed.

Instead of being hand-peeled in Annan in south-west Scotland, the fish would be sent to Thailand to be processed before being shipped all the way back to the UK. As a result, 120 workers at Young's in Annan would lose their jobs and, environmentalists contended, several more tonnes of carbon dioxide would be added to further heat up global warming.

The issue led to debate in the Scottish Parliament with one MSP asking: "How can government encourage companies to take social and environmental factors into account?"

The answer - or at least the first steps towards it - may well have been provided by the Companies Act 2006. The largest single piece of legislation in British history, weighing in at a hefty 1,300 sections, the Act overhauls and consolidates the law governing how companies are formed and run.

While many parts of the new legislation are designed to make running a company easier, a more controversial aspect is the bringing in, for the first time, of statutory duties for directors touching on areas beyond the balance sheet - notably how companies handle environmental matters, employees and social and community issues.

Whilst the intention behind the new "code of conduct" is to provide greater clarity on what is expected of company directors and make the law more accessible, it also sought to address the key question of "in whose interest should companies be run?" in the context of the modern business environment and wider expectations of responsible business behaviour.

The Act states that "a director of a company must act in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to:

The likely consequences of any decision in the long term.

The interests of the company's employees.

The need to foster the company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others.

The impact of the company's operations on the community and its environment.

The desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct.

The need to act fairly as between members of the company."

In other words, they have to think about more than just the bottom line.

In a case like Young's, a shareholder could conceivably argue that the company's directors had breached this duty by taking no regard of its employees, the environment and the local community since the decision to ship the shellfish thousands of miles away would have an adverse impact all three.

Importantly, the rights of shareholders in this area have also changed - they have been given a new statutory "power" which arguably makes it easier to bring a claim against a director on behalf of the company "in respect of a course of action arising from an actual or proposed act or omission involving negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust".

Under the Act a shareholder could start what is known as a derivative claim on behalf of the company against the directors through the courts. To take advantage of this new power you simply need to be a shareholder and importantly such a claim may be brought by a member of a company in respect of wrongs committed prior to their becoming a shareholder.

Those with an interest in ensuring protection for the environment and communities (who have been following the progress of the new Act and lobbying for more "dramatic change") are, it would seem, in some cases, already preparing strategies to mount such legal challenges against big business they see as adversely affecting the environment or local communities.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Scamper for Rule Changes; Focus It Is the Largest Piece of Legislation in British History and Is Set to Fundamentally Change the Way That Companies Operate. Ian McDonald of Newcastle Law Firm Ward Hadaway Looks at the Implications of the Companies Act 2006
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.