Demise of the Superconducting Super Collider

By Bowers, Lynne Jordan | SRA Journal, Spring 1994 | Go to article overview

Demise of the Superconducting Super Collider


Bowers, Lynne Jordan, SRA Journal


I was invited to provide this brief commentary about the federal government's decision in October 1993 to discontinue construction of the Superconducting Super Collider, a particle accelerator of unsurpassed power, size, and sophistication. The collider, which was being constructed south of Dallas, Texas, was arguably the largest science project in history. A primary goal was to find a particle called the Higgs Boson, which has so far eluded physicists but which theory indicates is the key to understanding what gives particles mass.

I administered a $100 million competitive research program for SSC-related research funded by the state of Texas. Over $44 million was awarded to approximately 100 universities in 34 states and Canada. Because I had the unpleasant task of terminating these grants and contracts, I strongly suspect that I am too much of an insider and still too deep in the trenches to present a totally dispassionate, accurate, erudite analysis of the fate of the SSC, one which historians would regard favorably. Having qualified myself and forewarned the reader that I am unwilling to share all my views at this time, there are some opinions that I will discuss.

It has been my observation that when funds are tight, a frequent political action is to "slay the wounded." When did the SSC become thought of as wounded? I was aware from what appeared in the popular press that it had occurred even before I arrived at the Commission in April 1991. A political cartoon by Bubba Flint showing a man labeled "Congress" with a large mallet labeled "Super Collider budget cuts" appeared in the February 11, 1991, Fort Worth Star-Telegram. A sampling of newspaper articles from November 1990 through March 1991 chronicles the cutbacks suffered in the 101st Congress and the turning tide for the SSC. The articles in this collection include those entitled "Supercollider is a superstar, so far," USA Today; "Democrats mull cuts in Super Collider funds," Houston Post; "Backers of Texas Supercollider hope to find subatomic particles and congressional funding," The Wall Street Journal; "Budget barrier could slow 54 mile track for atomic particles," Atlanta Journal/Constitution; and "Congressional aides cast skeptical eye on collider," Dallas Morning News.

I recall a luncheon conversation in September 1991 with a university governmental relations person from a state with a congressional representative who was very vocally opposed to the SSC. In her opinion, the Congressman was busy tilting at windmills, and the issue appeared to be neither the SSC nor the quality of the science but the publicity that could be drawn from opposing it.

The first, most obvious blow for the SSC occurred in June 1992, when the U.S. House of Representatives voted to kill the project. I was in DC the week after it happened and visited with a friend who is affiliated with a major news organization. Her comment to me then was that the SSC would live only as long as George Bush was president. Clearly the project was in trouble long before October 1993. I refer the interested reader to an analysis by Gary Taubes in the October 26, 1993, New York Times, entitled "The Super-collider: How big science lost favor and fell." With one exception, I believe it is a very good accounting of the SSC's history.

Although many contributing factors to the demise of the SSC have been cited by numerous observers, both knowledgeable and naive, I would like to discuss two here.

Number one is the design change proposed for the machine in 1989 and approved in 1990. The project cost estimate submitted to Congress in early 1987 was $5.3 billion (in FY88 dollars), with a completion date of 1996. The design change proposed to the U.S. Department of Energy by the Superconducting Super Collider Laboratory in December 1989, coupled with the estimates for detector design and construction, yielded an estimated cost of $7 to $8 billion. From fiscal year 1991 forward, successive years of less-than-full funding yielded a stretch-out that was predicted to take the total cost to $10 billion. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Demise of the Superconducting Super Collider
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.