Trust and Power-Distance: A Psychological Perspective on Fairness in Restorative Justice Conferences

By Sivasubramaniam, Diane; Goodman-Delahunty, Jane | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, November 2006 | Go to article overview

Trust and Power-Distance: A Psychological Perspective on Fairness in Restorative Justice Conferences


Sivasubramaniam, Diane, Goodman-Delahunty, Jane, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law


Psychological research indicates that trust in the independent third party affects the way in which disputants rate the fairness of legal procedures. This article addresses procedural variation in restorative justice practices, in the context of psychological research on procedural and distributive fairness. In particular, we describe differences in the ways in which high and low power-distance participants determine fairness in conferencing procedures. This article outlines the way in which convenor variation in conferencing programs may affect participants' perceptions of bias in these conference procedures, and the moderating effect of power-distance on the consequences of this perceived bias. The authors argue that a sensitive analysis of the ability of restorative justice procedures to deliver effective justice requires consideration of individual difference factors in conjunction with situational factors.

The Restorative Justice Approach

Therapeutic jurisprudence is a mental health approach to law that uses the tools of the behavioural sciences to reshape legal processes in ways that can improve the psychological functioning and emotional wellbeing of those affected. Therapeutic jurisprudence is an approach to legal intervention that aims to apply the law in a therapeutic way so long as other values, such as justice and due process, are fully respected (Wexler & Winick, 1996).

Restorative justice practices are consistent with this approach, emphasising healing the wounds of victims, offenders and communities caused by crime. Restorative justice differs from traditional punitive justice in that it focuses on repairing the harm caused by a crime, rather than on punishing an offender for breaking a law. Restorative justice consists of a variety of practices at various stages of the criminal legal process, including diversion from court, actions taken in conjunction with court decisions, and meetings between victims and offenders at any stage of the criminal process (Daly & Hayes, 2001). Conferencing is a restorative justice practice that brings together victims (and their support persons), offenders (and their support persons) and various members of the concerned community in an attempt to repair the damage done by a crime to the victim, the offender, and the community.

Restorative justice, in its various forms, has been proposed as a mechanism for addressing a range of offence types with a range of people. Bolitho (unpublished manuscript) explores the role of responsibility and moral emotions in the restorative justice process of reparation, and addresses the conditions that are required to make 'making amends', a good or at least acceptable practice. While these are important issues in all restorative justice procedures, this article will address the way in which these issues arise in restorative justice conferencing.

Conferencing Practices in Australia

Family Group Conferences, the precursor to many Australian conferencing models, were implemented in New Zealand in 1989. They were developed in close consultation with Maori communities, from whose culture the concept originated. Ideally, discussion takes place in a context of compassion, as opposed to the more adversarial environment associated with court. Young offenders must admit to the offence in order to be eligible for conference proceedings. Their supporters (often a parent or guardian), the victim and their supporters, various community members, and a conference convenor meet to discuss the offence and its consequences.

Offenders are given the opportunity to talk about the circumstances associated with the offence. The offender's supporters discuss how the offence has affected them, as do the victims and their supporters. Members of the community may also participate. After a review of the offence, discussion ensues of an outcome agreement that the young person is expected to complete. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Trust and Power-Distance: A Psychological Perspective on Fairness in Restorative Justice Conferences
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.