[IP.Sup.3]

By Sunder, Madhavi | Stanford Law Review, November 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

[IP.Sup.3]


Sunder, Madhavi, Stanford Law Review


INTRODUCTION

  I. IDENTITY POLITICS
      A. From Redistribution to Recognition
      B. The Property Turn in Identity Politics
      C. The Identity Turn in Intellectual Property
 II.  INTERNET PROTOCOL
      A. The Technology of Semiotic Democracy
      B. Techonomics and Technocracy
III. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
      A. The Failure of Utilitarianism as a Comprehensive Theory of
         Intellectual Property
      B. Case Studies
         1. MGM v. Grokster
         2. New from the Creative Commons: The developing nations
            license
         3. Access to essential medicines
         4. Geographical indications
         5. Fan fiction, mash-ups, machinima
         6. A2K: Access to knowledge
 IV. TOWARD A CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
      A. Development as Freedom
      B. Intellectual Property as Social Relations
      C. The New Enlightenment
      D. Foundations and Applications of a Cultural Theory
      E. IP Originalists' Demurral
CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION

A quarter century ago, Margaret Jane Radin interrupted the hegemonic law and economies discourse on property with a theory of personhood. (1) Earlier, the New Jersey Supreme Court had declared in the historic ease of State v. Shack that "[p]roperty rights serve human values." (2) From these our modern social relations" theory of property was born. (3) Property rights today balance myriad values, from efficiency to personhood, health, dignity, liberty, and distributive justice.

Now, the pundits declare that "[i]ntellectual property has come of age...." (4) But is intellectual property mature enough to face the world? Unlike its cousins property law and the First Amendment, which bear the weight of values such as autonomy, culture, equality, and democracy, in the United States intellectual property is understood almost exclusively as being about incentives. (5) Its theory is utilitarian, but with the maximand simply creative output. Intellectual property utilitarianism does not ask who makes the goods or whether the goods are fairly distributed to all who need them. To put it bluntly, there are no "giant-sized" (6) intellectual property theories capable of accommodating the full range (7) of human values implicit in intellectual production. (8) But there should be.

Intellectual property has grown, (9) perhaps exponentially, but its march into all comers of our lives and to the most destitute comers of the world has paradoxically exposed the fragility of its economic foundations while amplifying its social and cultural effects. It is increasingly evident that utilitarianism fails as a comprehensive theory of intellectual property, either descriptively or prescriptively. Scholars in both economics and law are unable to make economic sense of new rights. (10) Meanwhile, rapid-fire technological advances and new forms of creative output, from the advent of open source collaborative networks (11) to garage bands, remix culture, and the World Wide Web itself, (12) undermine utilitarian intellectual property law's very premise: that intellectual property rights are necessary to incentivize creation. (13)

At the same time, the legal regime of intellectual property has insinuated itself more deeply into our lives and more deeply into the framework of international law, affecting everything from the recreational home user's ability to share music, to the farmer's ability to replant seed, to the production and distribution of life-saving drugs. Indeed, with full compliance to the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement now required (as of January 1, 2005) in all but the world's very least developed countries, (14) intellectual property law becomes literally a question of life or death. (15)

Despite these real world changes, intellectual property scholars increasingly explain their field through the lens of economics. Giving evidence to Amartya Sen's observation that "[t]heories have lives of their own, quite defiantly of the phenomenal world that can be actually observed," (16) legal scholars continue to understand intellectual property as solely a tool to solve an economic "public goods" problem: nonrivalrous and nonexcludable goods such as music and scientific knowledge will be too easy to copy and share--thus wiping out any incentive to create them in the first place--without a monopoly right in the ideas for a limited period of time.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

[IP.Sup.3]
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?