Fear of Suffering Outweighs Death

By Pridonoff, John A. | Insight on the News, August 29, 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Fear of Suffering Outweighs Death


Pridonoff, John A., Insight on the News


Physician-assisted dying clearly has become the bioethical issue of the 1990s. Recent right-to-die ballot measures were narrowly defeated in two states. A third will be decided in Oregon this November. Michigan, Washington and New York all currently await the outcome of major, related court cases.

Despite the publicity accorded Dr. Jack Kevorkian and the best-selling books Final Exit and How We Die, physician-aided dying has reached this level of national debate not because of the notoriety of some of its proponents, but because of the ever-increasing sophistication of high-tech medicine and the ability of the medical community to keep the human body functioning long past its "natural" point of departure, or even its owner's wishes. As with so many modern issues, the debate about physician-aided dying has arisen because we, as a culture, have learned so well how to answer the question, "Can we do this?" and have never learned how to answer so easily the question, "Should we do this?"

For most of recorded history, physician-aided dying, although surely practiced, has not been an issue. Most people died of their first major illness, and life expectancies generally were short. Noted British physician and journalist Jonathan Miller estimates that not until the beginning of the 20th century did medicine do anything to prolong the average life, and it probably killed as many people as it cured.

The discovery and use of antibiotics marked the first great change in this situation, followed by the beginning of artificial life-support systems: respirators, feeding tubes, artificial nutrition, hydration and even artificial organs. With this constatly accelerating technological change, life could be prolonged, expanded and even saved -- or so it seemed.

But with the new technology, as we have learned all too well in every scientific field, came new questions. For example, what do we mean when we say "life"? Do we mean the continued functioning of the body? Of the brain? Or do we mean the continued experience of the human being? And if so, does that experience have to have quality as well as quantity?

Beginning in the 1970s, groups began to form to assert the right of physician-aided dying and to challenge legal restraints to it in the courts. First came the case of Karen Ann Quinlan, kept alive artificially until her family went to court and sued for the right to terminate life support for a brain-dead patient. (Quinlan's parents won the right to remove a respirator from her bedside in 1976; she died nine years later.) Then, in 1990, the case of Nancy Cruzan established the legal right of an individual to determine whether or not he or she would want to be kept alive artificially. Following the Supreme Court decision in the Cruzan case, Congress passed the Federal Patient Self-Determination Act, which clearly established the right of every patient to reject life-sustaining treatment.

There can be little doubt that these legal confrontations came in direct response to the changing landscape of medical science. Before the advent of machinery to artificially prolong life, the Quinlan and Cruzan cases would not have been possible. But at the same time, we witnessed an unmistakable response to the ever-worsening ways in which people died. The 1980s saw a dramatic rise in the number of reported cases of euthanasia and mercy killing. Of the 519 reported cases of assisted death between 1920 and 1993, 476 occurred after 1979. More than 91 percent of the reported cases of euthanasia and mercy killing in the past eight decades have been reported in the last 14 years. There can be no more telling statistic to indicate the fear of modern ways of dying than this. For many people, the suffering and excruciating pain of dying in America at the end of the 20th century are far, far more frightening than death itself.

There is every indication that the same response to the horrors of uncontrolled technology and modern disease has led many doctors to the conclusion that physician-aided dying is a grim necessity of our world.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Fear of Suffering Outweighs Death
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?