Non-Trivial Pursuits: Playing the Research Game

By Liebman, Bonnie | Nutrition Action Healthletter, October 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Non-Trivial Pursuits: Playing the Research Game


Liebman, Bonnie, Nutrition Action Healthletter


Welcome to the world of science, Ms. Howard. We're not surprised that you're confused. It's not a comforting, here's-how-the-world-works place, like the textbooks portrayed it in junior high.

But you'll feel less like a ping-pong ball once you see how many--and what kind of--studies researchers have to complete before they can state with reasonable certainty that a food or supplement causes or prevents a disease.

Most of those "well-publicized studies" you hear about are just one step in a game we call "Non-Trivial Pursuits."

"New Study Finds Vitamins Are Not Cancer Preventers," ran the headline in the New York Times last July.

It was the second time in three months that the "antioxidant" vitamins had failed to prevent cancer.

In April, a study of 29,000 Finnish smokers found an increased incidence of lung cancer in men taking beta-carotene (vitamin E had no clear effect). And in July, betacarotene, E, and C failed to prevent precancerous colon polyps in 864 Americans who had already had a polyp removed.(1)

Are these results disappointing? Yes. Are they proof that antioxidants don't work? No. But to some people, the failures meant that scientists were stupid, out to discredit vitamins, or both.

PUZZLE PIECES

"True, the finding of harm from betacarotene is puzzling, and may well be refuted by future trials," wrote New York Times science editor Nicholas Wade in an op-ed piece last May. "But that cannot be presumed."

How can Wade be so unfazed when people are tearing their hair out trying to get some straight answers? Perhaps because he understands how research works.

"What medical journals publish is not received wisdom but rather working papers...," write New England Journal of Medicine editors Jerome Kassirer and Marcia Angell. "Each study becomes a piece of a puzzle....No matter how important the conclusions, they should usually be considered tentative until a body of evidence accumulates pointing in the same direction."

PROVING CAUSE AND EFFECT

"Ignoring dozens of positive studies published in the last decade, the media has given enormous coverage to a single badly flawed Finnish study which supposedly showed negative results," charged Citizens for Health, a lobbying group supported by the supplement industry, last April.

But unlike the Finnish study, virtually none of those dozens of "positive" studies were randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled clinical intervention trials, which actually give people antioxidants (or whatever) and then wait to see what happens. Trials are less likely to suffer from pitfalls (see page 8).

For example, most of those "positive" studies simply "observed" lower cancer rates in people who consumed antioxidant vitamins, usually from a diet rich in fruits and vegetables.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Non-Trivial Pursuits: Playing the Research Game
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?